ObamaCare: It’s not about money
TCS Daily
by Barry A. Liebling
07/24/09
If the ObamaCare enthusiast believed that total spending on health care would go down if the government refrained from fiddling he would not be impressed. A health care system that is allowed to go its own way, that relies on markets, that is not centrally planned is odious to him. It is worthwhile to spend more money on health care if the result is a system managed by progressives who are looking out for ‘the interests of society as a whole.’ And what is in the mind of the free marketer? He knows that each person owns his life and has a natural right to manage it for himself. He understands that the proper role of government is to protect natural rights — not to direct the lives of individuals. He appreciates that people have the capacity to make intelligent choices, and that when some people act imprudently, it is not a justification for a government takeover. He knows that when government extricates itself from meddling in the health care system the result will be more innovation, better services, and less expensive costs. But it is the importance of freedom, not saving money, that is the essential reason to proscribe government interference...
http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=072309B
Obamacare: It’s even worse than you think
The Weekly Standard
by James C. Capretta & Yuval Levin
President Obama’s strategy to pass sweeping health care legislation rested on stealth and speed. The idea was to fill the conversation for months on end with vague talk about expanding coverage, ‘bending the cost-curve,’ improving quality, and rooting out waste, without showing the public how the plan would actually work or what it would cost. Legislation, meanwhile, would be composed behind closed doors, and the bills would be introduced as close as possible to when they might come up for a vote to minimize the time in which they could actually be read and thought about by those who would vote on them and those who would live under them. By the time the details emerged, maybe momentum and being ‘closer than ever before’ would be enough to overcome the torrent of objections that were sure to be raised when people got a real look at the nuts and bolts. That moment has now come... (for publication 08/03/09)
http://tinyurl.com/nyf4vr
“Fearmongers” were right about Obamacare
Cato Institute
by Michael D. Tanner
04/30/10
The ink was barely dry on President Barack Obama’s signature before the RAND Corp. released a report concluding that, not only would the hard-won health care package fail to curb health insurance premium increases, but the bill itself would drive premiums for young people up as much as 17 percent. This should not have been a surprise: the Congressional Budget Office had already warned that the plan would do almost nothing to reduce premium hikes. And when New York implemented the same type of insurance reforms in the 1980s, it led to an increase of nearly $500 per year for young people. But somehow, the media didn’t pay much attention...
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11738
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
--------
The Health Insurance Racket: Getting Rich by Denying Americans Care
http://www.commondreams.org/video/2009/08/07
--------
Obamacare and the Politics of Revenge
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north829.html
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Obama
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Obamacare
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=healthcare
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=health+insurance
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Barry+A.+Liebling
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=James+C.+Capretta
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Yuval+Levin
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=com/north
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Michael+D.+Tanner
by Barry A. Liebling
07/24/09
If the ObamaCare enthusiast believed that total spending on health care would go down if the government refrained from fiddling he would not be impressed. A health care system that is allowed to go its own way, that relies on markets, that is not centrally planned is odious to him. It is worthwhile to spend more money on health care if the result is a system managed by progressives who are looking out for ‘the interests of society as a whole.’ And what is in the mind of the free marketer? He knows that each person owns his life and has a natural right to manage it for himself. He understands that the proper role of government is to protect natural rights — not to direct the lives of individuals. He appreciates that people have the capacity to make intelligent choices, and that when some people act imprudently, it is not a justification for a government takeover. He knows that when government extricates itself from meddling in the health care system the result will be more innovation, better services, and less expensive costs. But it is the importance of freedom, not saving money, that is the essential reason to proscribe government interference...
http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=072309B
Obamacare: It’s even worse than you think
The Weekly Standard
by James C. Capretta & Yuval Levin
President Obama’s strategy to pass sweeping health care legislation rested on stealth and speed. The idea was to fill the conversation for months on end with vague talk about expanding coverage, ‘bending the cost-curve,’ improving quality, and rooting out waste, without showing the public how the plan would actually work or what it would cost. Legislation, meanwhile, would be composed behind closed doors, and the bills would be introduced as close as possible to when they might come up for a vote to minimize the time in which they could actually be read and thought about by those who would vote on them and those who would live under them. By the time the details emerged, maybe momentum and being ‘closer than ever before’ would be enough to overcome the torrent of objections that were sure to be raised when people got a real look at the nuts and bolts. That moment has now come... (for publication 08/03/09)
http://tinyurl.com/nyf4vr
“Fearmongers” were right about Obamacare
Cato Institute
by Michael D. Tanner
04/30/10
The ink was barely dry on President Barack Obama’s signature before the RAND Corp. released a report concluding that, not only would the hard-won health care package fail to curb health insurance premium increases, but the bill itself would drive premiums for young people up as much as 17 percent. This should not have been a surprise: the Congressional Budget Office had already warned that the plan would do almost nothing to reduce premium hikes. And when New York implemented the same type of insurance reforms in the 1980s, it led to an increase of nearly $500 per year for young people. But somehow, the media didn’t pay much attention...
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11738
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
--------
The Health Insurance Racket: Getting Rich by Denying Americans Care
http://www.commondreams.org/video/2009/08/07
--------
Obamacare and the Politics of Revenge
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north829.html
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Obama
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Obamacare
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=healthcare
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=health+insurance
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Barry+A.+Liebling
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=James+C.+Capretta
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Yuval+Levin
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=com/north
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Michael+D.+Tanner
rudkla - 27. Jul, 09:58
