More intervention equals more proliferation
Independent Institute
by Charles Pena
07/06/07
U.S. leaders need to face the reality that interventionist U.S. foreign policy has consequences on the nuclear proliferation front. Those who encouraged and supported America’s post-Cold war military interventions — Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and liberals — need to ask themselves whether increasing the incentives for nuclear proliferation was worth the price of intervention when U.S. national security was not at stake. Especially when that price is now the potential threat of nuclear terrorism...
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1995
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=nuclear+proliferation
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=interventionist
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Charles+Pena
by Charles Pena
07/06/07
U.S. leaders need to face the reality that interventionist U.S. foreign policy has consequences on the nuclear proliferation front. Those who encouraged and supported America’s post-Cold war military interventions — Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and liberals — need to ask themselves whether increasing the incentives for nuclear proliferation was worth the price of intervention when U.S. national security was not at stake. Especially when that price is now the potential threat of nuclear terrorism...
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1995
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=nuclear+proliferation
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=interventionist
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Charles+Pena
rudkla - 9. Jul, 11:26
