Tetra saving costing lives
Finnish 2007 comparative tests show Tetra mobile signal is the most troublesome source of digital mobile interference to medical equipment.
http://www.iss.it/binary/publ/cont/STAMPA%20ANN_07_32%20Hietanen.1190882108.pdf
Equivalent tests by the UK's MHRA were 'interpreted' to reach a conclusion that Tetra was 'no worse than' mobile phones.
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Safetyinformation/Generalsafetyinformationandadvice/Technicalinformation/Mobilecommunicationsinterference/CON019620
Now that Airwave has been adopted by UK ambulance services expect the opposite to Airwave promoters earlier inflated 'it will save lives' claims.
Any such 'mishap' will of course be assisted to pass unnoticed and if ever identified the authorities accustomed response will be to blame the design of adversely affected electronic equipment.
(from Catherine via artjar)
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Tetra
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/TETRA/
http://www.iss.it/binary/publ/cont/STAMPA%20ANN_07_32%20Hietanen.1190882108.pdf
Equivalent tests by the UK's MHRA were 'interpreted' to reach a conclusion that Tetra was 'no worse than' mobile phones.
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Safetyinformation/Generalsafetyinformationandadvice/Technicalinformation/Mobilecommunicationsinterference/CON019620
Now that Airwave has been adopted by UK ambulance services expect the opposite to Airwave promoters earlier inflated 'it will save lives' claims.
Any such 'mishap' will of course be assisted to pass unnoticed and if ever identified the authorities accustomed response will be to blame the design of adversely affected electronic equipment.
(from Catherine via artjar)
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Tetra
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/TETRA/
rudkla - 27. Feb, 13:19
