The endless occupation: Obama scraps Iraq withdrawal plan
AntiWar.Com
by Justin Raimondo
05/14/10
Keeping his campaign promises has not been Barack Obama’s strong point, as those who hoped the closing of Guantanamo would end a shameful chapter in American history have learnt to their sorrow: and surely those who hoped ‘change’ meant a new era in American foreign policy have reason to be disappointed. As usual, on most issues Obama gave himself a lot of wiggle room, so that if a strategic shift were required he could dance around the contradiction with ease, but on one question he painted himself into a corner: ‘Let me say this as plainly as I can: by August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end.’ He said that, not only during the campaign, but in a speech at Camp Lejeune last year. However, it looks like his administration is preparing to backtrack …
http://tinyurl.com/29759gx
Obama scraps Iraq withdrawal plan
CounterPunch
by David Swanson
05/13/10
So, we elected a president who promised a withdrawal from Iraq that he, or the generals who tell him what to do, is now further delaying. And, of course, the timetable he’s now delaying was already a far cry from what he had promised as a candidate.What are we to think? That may be sad news, but what could we have done differently? Surely it would have been worse to elect a president who did not promise to withdraw, right?
http://counterpunch.org/swanson05132010.html
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Obama
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Iraq+withdraw
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=occupation
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Guantanamo
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=raimondo
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=David+Swanson
by Justin Raimondo
05/14/10
Keeping his campaign promises has not been Barack Obama’s strong point, as those who hoped the closing of Guantanamo would end a shameful chapter in American history have learnt to their sorrow: and surely those who hoped ‘change’ meant a new era in American foreign policy have reason to be disappointed. As usual, on most issues Obama gave himself a lot of wiggle room, so that if a strategic shift were required he could dance around the contradiction with ease, but on one question he painted himself into a corner: ‘Let me say this as plainly as I can: by August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end.’ He said that, not only during the campaign, but in a speech at Camp Lejeune last year. However, it looks like his administration is preparing to backtrack …
http://tinyurl.com/29759gx
Obama scraps Iraq withdrawal plan
CounterPunch
by David Swanson
05/13/10
So, we elected a president who promised a withdrawal from Iraq that he, or the generals who tell him what to do, is now further delaying. And, of course, the timetable he’s now delaying was already a far cry from what he had promised as a candidate.What are we to think? That may be sad news, but what could we have done differently? Surely it would have been worse to elect a president who did not promise to withdraw, right?
http://counterpunch.org/swanson05132010.html
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Obama
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Iraq+withdraw
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=occupation
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Guantanamo
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=raimondo
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=David+Swanson
rudkla - 14. Mai, 09:03