Today, being described as a “constitutionalist” can have fatal consequences
http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2008/01/nanny-state-goes-nazi.html
Informant: Lew Rockwell
--------
This is What A Police State Looks Like
Georgilla
MySpace
January 13, 2008
Watch video: http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1650
This is What A Police State Looks Like
Related: Inside the Martial Law Act of 2006
James Bovard
Counterpunch
January 9, 2008
Martial law is perhaps the ultimate stomping of freedom. And yet, on September 30, 2006, Congress passed a provision in a 591-page bill that will make it easy for President Bush to impose martial law in response to a terrorist "incident." It also empowers him to effectively declare martial law in response to what he or other federal officials label a shortfall of "public order" — whatever that means.
It took only a few paragraphs in a $500 billion, 591-page bill to raze one of the most important limits on federal power. Congress passed the Insurrection Act in 1807 to severely restrict the president's ability to deploy the military within the United States. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 tightened those restrictions, imposing a two-year prison sentence on anyone who used the military within the United States without the express permission of Congress. (This act was passed after the depredations of the U.S. military throughout the Southern states during Reconstruction.)
But there is a loophole: Posse Comitatus is waived if the president invokes the Insurrection Act.
The Insurrection Act and Posse Comitatus Act aim to deter dictatorship while permitting a narrow window for the president to temporarily use the military at home. But the 2006 reforms basically threw any concern about dictatorial abuses out the window.
Section 1076 of the Defense Authorization Act of 2006 changed the name of the key provision in the statute book from "Insurrection Act" to "Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act." The Insurrection Act of 1807 stated that the president could deploy troops within the United States only "to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy." The new law expands the list of pretexts to include "natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition" — and such a "condition" is not defined or limited.
Article continues: http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1645
Informant: shane_digital
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=police+state
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=constitutionalist
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Martial+Law+Act
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=James+Bovard
Informant: Lew Rockwell
--------
This is What A Police State Looks Like
Georgilla
MySpace
January 13, 2008
Watch video: http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1650
This is What A Police State Looks Like
Related: Inside the Martial Law Act of 2006
James Bovard
Counterpunch
January 9, 2008
Martial law is perhaps the ultimate stomping of freedom. And yet, on September 30, 2006, Congress passed a provision in a 591-page bill that will make it easy for President Bush to impose martial law in response to a terrorist "incident." It also empowers him to effectively declare martial law in response to what he or other federal officials label a shortfall of "public order" — whatever that means.
It took only a few paragraphs in a $500 billion, 591-page bill to raze one of the most important limits on federal power. Congress passed the Insurrection Act in 1807 to severely restrict the president's ability to deploy the military within the United States. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 tightened those restrictions, imposing a two-year prison sentence on anyone who used the military within the United States without the express permission of Congress. (This act was passed after the depredations of the U.S. military throughout the Southern states during Reconstruction.)
But there is a loophole: Posse Comitatus is waived if the president invokes the Insurrection Act.
The Insurrection Act and Posse Comitatus Act aim to deter dictatorship while permitting a narrow window for the president to temporarily use the military at home. But the 2006 reforms basically threw any concern about dictatorial abuses out the window.
Section 1076 of the Defense Authorization Act of 2006 changed the name of the key provision in the statute book from "Insurrection Act" to "Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act." The Insurrection Act of 1807 stated that the president could deploy troops within the United States only "to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy." The new law expands the list of pretexts to include "natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition" — and such a "condition" is not defined or limited.
Article continues: http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1645
Informant: shane_digital
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=police+state
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=constitutionalist
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Martial+Law+Act
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=James+Bovard
rudkla - 14. Jan, 07:32
