Missile defense erodes security
Independent Institute
by Charles Pena
05/09/07
According to the Bush administration, missile defense is intended to protect against the threat of so-called rogue states — none of which currently have the long-range ballistic missile capability to attack the United States (although some might be able to reach parts of Europe). But if missile defense is not needed to defend against rogue states who do not have the capability to attack America, is missile defense primarily about defending the U.S. homeland, or is it intended to support U.S. interventionist policy using military force — including preventive war — throughout the world?
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1966
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=missile+defense
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Charles+Pena
by Charles Pena
05/09/07
According to the Bush administration, missile defense is intended to protect against the threat of so-called rogue states — none of which currently have the long-range ballistic missile capability to attack the United States (although some might be able to reach parts of Europe). But if missile defense is not needed to defend against rogue states who do not have the capability to attack America, is missile defense primarily about defending the U.S. homeland, or is it intended to support U.S. interventionist policy using military force — including preventive war — throughout the world?
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1966
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=missile+defense
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Charles+Pena
rudkla - 10. Mai, 14:47
