The steady march to war on Iran
CounterPunch
by Virginia Tilley
01/18/07
From its inception, the US occupation was a lose-lose proposition. Simply rolling into Iraq — a society of which the Bush neocons had so distorted a conception and US occupation commanders and foot soldiers had no grasp at all — was a formula for doom. But US policy in the Middle East has now advanced to a new stage and the risk to the rest of us has changed. For stopping an attack on Iran, which is the only way to avert final regional disaster, may require action in Washington that falls outside the parameters of what is normally politically possible...
http://www.counterpunch.org/tilley01182007.html
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=neocons
by Virginia Tilley
01/18/07
From its inception, the US occupation was a lose-lose proposition. Simply rolling into Iraq — a society of which the Bush neocons had so distorted a conception and US occupation commanders and foot soldiers had no grasp at all — was a formula for doom. But US policy in the Middle East has now advanced to a new stage and the risk to the rest of us has changed. For stopping an attack on Iran, which is the only way to avert final regional disaster, may require action in Washington that falls outside the parameters of what is normally politically possible...
http://www.counterpunch.org/tilley01182007.html
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=neocons
rudkla - 19. Jan, 15:36
