THESE GUIDELINES ARE NO PROTECTION
Bath Chronicle
11:00 - 03 March 2006
So mobile phone operator spokesman, Michael Dolan still, in my opinion, attempts to misinform the public about the inadequacy of the supposed "protective" phone mast radiation (ICNIRP) guidelines (Chronicle, February 23). Independent research regularly proves the dangers to health of this harmful technology.
It is readily available to all (please see Mast Sanity website).
http://www.mastsanity.org/
I challenge Mr Dolan to name one research paper that proves conclusively that there is no long term danger to public health from this dangerous technology.
Unsurprisingly, Mr Dolan liberally quotes the compliant World Health Organisation on this matter.
The WHO's spokesman (and ICNIRP member) Michael Repacholi, heads its radiation department and electro magnetic frequency committee.
He systematically downplays and ignores the numerous scientific findings which prove that this cellular technology is not safe. So why does the WHO's Michael Repacholi refuse to guide governments to take the appropriate safety measures and protect human lives from this worldwide threat to our health?
Perhaps it's something to do with the 150,000 dollars a year he receives from the cellular phone industry.
Hardly surprising, Mr Dolan, that you failed to mention this, or the fact that there is a worldwide petition to remove this dangerous man from his vested interested position.
Omega see under: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/409444403 and
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/877606/
With the ever-increasing ill health and cancer clusters appearing in the vicinity of phone masts it is scandalous that the current outdated guidelines, trumpeted by government and phone operators, do not acknowledge the biological effects of the radiation emissions on the human body. They only researched the thermal (heating) effects. These guidelines as 'protection' are equivalent to a fireguard in front of a defective gas fire that is giving out carbon monoxide - it might stop you getting burned but you might not be alive to care.
Omega see "Cancer Clusters in Vicinity to Cell-Phone Transmitter Stations" under: http://omega.twoday.net/stories/580224/
JOHN ELLIOTT
Bristol
11:00 - 03 March 2006
So mobile phone operator spokesman, Michael Dolan still, in my opinion, attempts to misinform the public about the inadequacy of the supposed "protective" phone mast radiation (ICNIRP) guidelines (Chronicle, February 23). Independent research regularly proves the dangers to health of this harmful technology.
It is readily available to all (please see Mast Sanity website).
http://www.mastsanity.org/
I challenge Mr Dolan to name one research paper that proves conclusively that there is no long term danger to public health from this dangerous technology.
Unsurprisingly, Mr Dolan liberally quotes the compliant World Health Organisation on this matter.
The WHO's spokesman (and ICNIRP member) Michael Repacholi, heads its radiation department and electro magnetic frequency committee.
He systematically downplays and ignores the numerous scientific findings which prove that this cellular technology is not safe. So why does the WHO's Michael Repacholi refuse to guide governments to take the appropriate safety measures and protect human lives from this worldwide threat to our health?
Perhaps it's something to do with the 150,000 dollars a year he receives from the cellular phone industry.
Hardly surprising, Mr Dolan, that you failed to mention this, or the fact that there is a worldwide petition to remove this dangerous man from his vested interested position.
Omega see under: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/409444403 and
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/877606/
With the ever-increasing ill health and cancer clusters appearing in the vicinity of phone masts it is scandalous that the current outdated guidelines, trumpeted by government and phone operators, do not acknowledge the biological effects of the radiation emissions on the human body. They only researched the thermal (heating) effects. These guidelines as 'protection' are equivalent to a fireguard in front of a defective gas fire that is giving out carbon monoxide - it might stop you getting burned but you might not be alive to care.
Omega see "Cancer Clusters in Vicinity to Cell-Phone Transmitter Stations" under: http://omega.twoday.net/stories/580224/
JOHN ELLIOTT
Bristol
rudkla - 4. Mär, 13:12
