Dienstag, 21. März 2006

Stop the National Forest sell-off: protect these priceless wildlands for all Americans

The Bush administration wants to sell off an astonishing 300,000 acres of our national forest lands across 35 different states -- to pay for its mismanagement of America's finances.

We need your immediate action to stop this raid on our natural heritage, which would sacrifice some of our nation's most treasured wildlands, including irreplaceable expanses of several NRDC BioGems.

Go to http://www.savebiogems.org/takeaction.asp and tell the U.S. Forest Service to withdraw this proposal to sell off any part of our national forests for the sake of funding budget shortfalls.

The Bush administration has cynically put forward this national forest sell-off as a fast way to raise millions to pay for a rural schools program that has run out of funding.

America's rural schools deserve financial support -- but destroying our legacy of national forests to pay the bills is unconscionable.

The Bush administration's lengthy list of "Forests For Sale" includes prime habitat in Montana for bears, elk and wolves; popular recreation spots in Alaska's Tongass National Forest; old-growth forests in northern California; wildlife-rich ecosystems in the Appalachians and hundreds of other natural treasures.

Logging companies, real estate developers and other commercial interests are already lining up to start the bidding.

Go to http://www.savebiogems.org/takeaction.asp and tell the Forest Service to protect these priceless wildlands for all Americans, present and future.

Thank you for helping to protect the legacy of America's national forests.

Sincerely,

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
NRDC Senior Attorney

Critics Fight to Restrict Cell Towers

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/critics_fight_to_restrict_cell_towers.htm

Yes, dear Eileen, I have many times pointed this out for you and others - this is one of the very dangerous "grenades" I am always talking about.

Best regards Yours Olle

(Olle Johansson, assoc. prof. The Experimental Dermatology Unit Department of Neuroscience Karolinska Institute
171 77 Stockholm Sweden)

--------

I totally agree with Andy 500 feet is still in the danger zone!

Best wishes

Eileen

--------

500 feet?

That's 166m, smack in the zone where the main beam strikes ground. Nice trend; impossible for 3G/UMTS, but also masts placed just outside this are doing schools no favours.

OK, I'm always the pessimist! BUT that is what this means. Just like our 15m height rule in planning encourages slightly lower masts in our streets, beaming straight into 3rd floors, houses on slopes, blocks of flats etc., so mats will appear at 510ft from schools to escape the ruling. Sometimes a rule can be less productive than it seems... and you can pass this observation around for comment if you like as well!

Cheers

Andy

The Meatrix - How factory farms undercut public health

http://www.themeatrix.com/

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FACTORY FARMS

The Meatrix film highlighted four ways in which factory farms affect us – animal welfare, antibiotic resistant bacteria, pollution and destroyed communities. Factory farms also affect us in many other ways – find out information on the wide range of factors that contribute to the devastating impacts of industrial agriculture.

http://www.themeatrix.com/information/

--------

MEAT-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX HOW FACTORY FARMS UNDERCUT PUBLIC HEALTH

By Mark Winne
In These Times
March 22, 2006

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2525/

How factory farms undercut public health
By Mark Winne

The sorry gaze of a factory farm commodity.

Drive through Don Oppliger’s Feed Yard in Clovis, New Mexico, and you’ll see 35,000 head of beef cattle confined to pens that stretch across the flat, barren landscape.

The constant shuffling of hooves raises a bacteria-laden dust cloud that’s carried by the prevailing winds into west Texas, where it joins the plumes of hundreds of other feedlots. At one end of the complex sits a giant lagoon that catches the operation’s chemicals, urine, antibiotics and other effluvia. In the narrow strip of land that separates the fencing from the road lie the carcasses of dead cows (a.k.a. “downers”), eyes bugged out, tongues dangling and bellies bloated in the summer heat.

Moving from bovine to porcine, factory hog farms generate an odor so intense it would knock a buzzard off a shit-wagon. In cramped warehouse structures, as many as 20,000 hogs are confined for their entire lives. After five months, the mature hogs are sent off to the slaughterhouse to have their throats slit and carcasses dipped in chemical vats to loosen their skins. According to Anita Poole, legal counsel for the Oklahoma-based Kerr Center, which has fought that state’s takeover by the hog industry, “The average Joe Blow who might stumble into a hog facility would never want to eat pork again.”

U.S. shoppers spend less on food as a percentage of their total annual expenditures than anyone else in the world. But this is because factory livestock farms—labeled “concentrated animal feeding operations” (CAFOs) by government agencies—don’t pay for the natural resources they have squandered, the farm labor they have maltreated, the declining health of residents who live near their operations, or the animals that have been exploited far beyond their biological capabilities.

Texas County is in Oklahoma’s Panhandle region. In 1990 it had 11,000 hogs. Today, according to the Kerr Center, the number has swollen to more than one million. For a region that was in economic decline, the offer by Seaboard Farms to locate an industrial-style hog operation held out the promise of reinvigorating the flagging economy, creating desperately needed jobs and re-filling the empty school desks.

But it came with a price. Seaboard demanded and received $60 million in local and state government assistance. This worked out to $27,552 per new job, a tolerable sum if the jobs paid $20 per hour, but the average hourly Seaboard wage was less than $8. In spite of the low wages, the deal might have been justified if the community received a commensurate growth in tax revenues. But by the time the county completed the financing deal with Seaboard, they had agreed to taxes of $9,700 per year until 2017 on a business site valued at $100 million. Even after Seaboard agreed to pay $175,000 annually to the district’s school board for the next 25 years, this still amounted to the county forgoing $120,000 per year.

Factory hog operations not only pay a meager return on a community’s investment, they also extract a high price from the surrounding region. With Seaboard’s influx of jobs came an increase in population, which in turn brought about a sharp rise in crime. From 1990 to 1997, crime in Texas County increased by 74 percent compared to a 12 percent decline in other rural Oklahoma counties. And factory farm workers in the West and Midwest are increasingly Mexican immigrants, only about half of whom are legally documented. They bring with them a host of needs that these rural communities are unequipped to handle.

But the worst problems are created by the ungodly amount of manure—an estimated 15 million pounds per day in Texas County. Because of water run-off from factory farms, both groundwater and surface water quality have declined. Even worse, the Ogallala Aquifer upon which the region depends for its water is being depleted at a rapid rate. The Oklahoma Water Resource Board reported that water levels in many Texas County wells have dropped 50 to 100 feet over the last 30 years, due in large part to the high water demand of factory hog operations and the irrigated farmland that supports them.

Across the nation, factory farms of all types are wreaking environmental havoc. A 1995 North Carolina manure spill killed 10 million fish and closed 364,000 acres of coastal shellfish beds. In 2004 the Iowa Department of Natural Resources recorded ammonia levels near a hog factory that were six times the recommended health standard. In California’s San Joaquin Valley, air pollution from factory dairy farms is a major reason that the region’s children have asthma rates three times the national average. In eastern New Mexico—the state’s factory dairy farm belt—recent research discovered antibiotic-resistant bacteria in dairy yards. For these reasons, the American Public Health Association has urged all levels of government to impose a moratorium on new CAFOs until a comprehensive environmental and health assessment can be conducted.

Herein lies the rub. The same government and private industry partnership that brought CAFOs to America’s marginalized rural communities is highly invested in not just keeping them there, but in seeing them metastasize. Through lax environmental regulations or the under-funding of agencies charged with regulating CAFOs, state governments have fostered CAFO-friendly policies at the public’s expense. To further protect their flank, factory farm interests have worked aggressively in state legislatures to restrict the ability of local government to keep CAFOs out of their communities. And just to be sure, New Mexico’s dairy industry considers it an act of “civic duty” for its farmer members to “serve” on local commissions and boards.

The halls of academe have likewise been compromised by CAFO industry “donations” to universities. Rather than use their scientific talents to assess the impact of CAFOs, research faculty are required to solve the industry’s problems (e.g., disposing of Himalayan mountains of manure). In 1998, New Mexico State University researcher Stephen Arnold found serious air and water quality problems near dairy operations in southern New Mexico. When the results were released through professional journals and conferences, the dairy industry complained so vehemently to the university that Arnold abandoned his research. And the Kerr Center’s Poole reports, “Oklahoma State University won’t do community impact research because of all the money they get from the pork industry.”

Barely 5 percent of U.S. farms now raise 54 percent of the country’s beef and dairy cattle. Corporations now produce 98 percent of all poultry. Small to mid-size family livestock farms are going the way of the dodo. While “local food movements” and a resurgent interest in grass-fed and free-range animal production are gaining traction and deserve our full support, they will never be enough to stem the “blood-dimmed tide” of the livestock industry.

Are the research reports, the scientific studies, and the occasional manure spill only isolated “factoids” in an otherwise benign landscape of inevitable agricultural modernization? Or is the increasing flow of data and the growing number of incident reports the proverbial canary in a coal mine? A recent World Watch Institute paper pronounced, “Factory Farms are breaking the cycle between small farmers, their animals and the environment, with collateral damage to human health and local communities.” And the Washington Post reported on North Carolina State University professor C.M. “Mike” Williams, who has spent five years researching how to treat manure from the state’s 10 million hogs. He concluded, “I do not feel that system [of factory hog farms] is long-term sustainable.”

Dr. Charles Benbrook, a former executive director of the Board of Agriculture for the National Academy of Science, shares Williams’ assessment. After years spent studying the dairy industry, Benbrook says he is “perplexed” by the growth of gargantuan dairy farms west of the Mississippi where subsidized water supplies in an otherwise dry landscape have made the expansion of dairy herds feasible—in the short term. In the long term, says Benbrook, further expansion of factory dairy farms “doesn’t make sense and is patently unsustainable because water will become too costly, and in not less than five years, but surely no more than 20, the dairy waste stream will overwhelm the absorptive capacity of the local environment.”

In other words, our food system may be looking at a doomsday denouement before the middle of this century. It is becoming increasingly certain that the water will run out, the land will no longer absorb the torrent of nutrient waste spread upon it, and the over-bred, antibiotic and hormone-injected animals will eventually succumb to their natural limitations. Poole puts it this way, “The factory system of food production will simply implode.” Until the citizens of the heartland rise up in sufficient numbers to hold their government and the corporations accountable, this is both the best and worst we can hope for.



THE MEATRIX 2

The Meatrix 2 has Launched!!!

It's been two years since Free Range produced the runaway hit and winner of the Webby award, "The Meatrix." Now, the action packed sequel is here!

Follow Moopheus, Leo and Chickity as they dive deeper into the Meatrix to uncover the the truth about factory farming.

Suggested: first watch: The Meatrix (1) http://www.themeatrix.com

and then see part two right afterwards!
The Meatrix 2: Revolted http://www.meatrix2.com



OLD BIG BROTHER HAD A FARM
http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/33967/


Informant: NHNE

--------

LOVE OF NATURE, OUTDOOR SPORTS, & THE GRIM FUTURE
http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy33.htm

--------

Life's diversity 'being depleted'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/sci/tech/4826262.stm

Head critical of Vodafone bid for mast

A Shrewsbury headteacher today spoke out against plans by mobile phone giant Vodafone to build a 12-metre high mast less than 100 yards from his primary school.

The company wants to put its 3G antenna at a site next to the Inn on the Green pub, on Bank Farm Road — near Radbrook Primary School.

Vodafone’s plans have also sparked fury from residents and borough council leader Peter Nutting, who claims the science behind phone masts is not safe.

But the phone company says there is no scientific basis for having a “buffer zone” around homes or schools.

Acting head of Radbrook Primary Ian Nurser said he was worried that just a handful of parents at the school and nursery had been informed by Vodafone of its plans.

“My concern is the safety implications because unless we can get categorical reassurance that there is no risk to the children then I will oppose it,” he said.

The full version of this article appears in some editions of tonight’s Shropshire Star.

© 2003-06 Shropshire Newspapers Ltd

http://www.shropshirestar.com/show_article.php?aID=43611

WORKSHOP ON THE IMPACTS OF NON-IONISING RADIATION ON WILDLIFE

"PSYCHOTIC BIRDS?"

We consider this newsworthy. Report is attached.

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/workshopontheimpactsof_nir.pdf
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/english_nature_calls_symposium_on_non.doc

Worth wider distribution if only to counter the public and snide accusations of mental instability aimed at our human sufferers by those wishing to deny and delay proper scientific study of this issue.

Please circulate and use with or without acknowledgement in any way you see fit.

Rod

ElectroSensitivity-UK (registered charity 1103018) assisted by The Foyle Foundation.

Rod Read M.Phil., (Cantab), Dip Psych Couns., Cert.Ed. director

A new organisation supporting sufferers and educating the public in recognition of this sensitive reaction affecting a vulnerable minority exposed to RF, microwave and general electromagnetic radiation from powerlines, mobile phones, VDUs and all manner of EMF sources.

We particularly welcome help from scientists, doctors and health experts in understanding causes and links, especially to MCS, CFS and Thyroid problems and in diagnosis and treatments generally.

From ES-UK Office, Bury Lane, Sutton, Ely, Cambs, CB6 2BB.
Tel: 01353-778151 or at http://www.electrosensitivity.org.uk
Also by e-mail at electrosensitivity@hotmail.com

Trustees: Professor of Human Radiation Effects Dr Denis Henshaw, Dr David Dowson MD., ChB, Jean Philips BA. Scientific advice from: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk, Keith Jamieson Dip.AAS. Bsc (Hons) RIBA. Inst.Ph., Environmental Consultant and others. Visit http://www.tetrawatch.net


Informant: Eileen O'Connor

--------

Pulsed microwave radiation and wildlife - Are Cell Phones Wiping Out Sparrows?
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/926007/

LONDON BOROUGH TAKES ON MOBILE PHONE GIANT

A London community have successfully persuaded their council not to renew the lease of a phone mast on top of a block of council flats.

The lease with mobile phone company Orange expired last year and despite pressure from the company to renew the lease, the London Borough of Greenwich have put the interests of the community, residents and tenants before those of a commercial company as they are supposed to. Orange have been ordered to remove the mast from Westcombe Court by June 30th.

"This is a major breakthrough for other councils and communities because this community has persuaded the council to put their interests before those of the mobile phone company," says Mast Sanity trustee Amanda Wesley.

"Councils have an obligation to put the interests of the community, tenants, leaseholders and residents before those of commercial companies but many seemed afraid of the mobile phone companies. We applaud this council for exercising their responsibilities to residents and the community in this case. This is a victory for democracy. Mast Sanity urges other councils to follow this example."

"Colin Fancy, one of the campaigners involved in the three year battle involving people living in the block of flats and adjacent to it says, " I urge other communities to look into the terms of these leases and their rights. This has been a long and hard three year battle. Not only was the phone mast a visual eye sore in our conservation area but there were health and safety issues, such as the maintenance of equipment, which, overhung walkways in addition to the other health problems we had experienced".

"Councils must be forced to put the interests of tenants, occupiers, and residents as they are supposed to, before those of these commercial multinationals, who are purely motivated by profit and greed."

NGOs Call on Governments to Strengthen the Human Right to Water

http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0320-05.htm

Using Our Might to Keep Oil Cheap

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0320-20.htm

World-News

Independent Media Source

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Trump and His Allies...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/06/21/trump- and-his-allies-are-clear-a nd-present-danger-american -democracy?utm_source=dail y_newsletter&utm_medium=Em ail&utm_campaign=daily_new sletter_op
rudkla - 22. Jun, 05:09
The Republican Party...
https://truthout.org/artic les/the-republican-party-i s-still-doing-donald-trump s-bidding/?eType=EmailBlas tContent&eId=804d4873-50dd -4c1b-82a5-f465ac3742ce
rudkla - 26. Apr, 05:36
January 6 Committee Says...
https://truthout.org/artic les/jan-6-committee-says-t rump-engaged-in-criminal-c onspiracy-to-undo-election /?eType=EmailBlastContent& eId=552e5725-9297-4a7c-a21 4-53c8c51615a3
rudkla - 4. Mär, 05:38
Georgia Republicans Are...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/02/14/georgi a-republicans-are-delibera tely-attacking-voting-righ ts
rudkla - 15. Feb, 05:03
Now Every Day Is January...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/02/07/now-ev ery-day-january-6-trump-ta rgets-vote-counters
rudkla - 8. Feb, 05:41

Archiv

März 2006
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
 
 
 

Status

Online seit 7136 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 22. Jun, 05:09

Credits


Afghanistan
Animal Protection - Tierschutz
AUFBRUCH für Bürgerrechte, Freiheit und Gesundheit
Big Brother - NWO
Brasilien-Brasil
Britain
Canada
Care2 Connect
Chemtrails
Civil Rights - Buergerrechte - Politik
Cuts in Social Welfare - Sozialabbau
Cybermobbing
Datenschutzerklärung
Death Penalty - Todesstrafe
Depleted Uranium Poisoning (D.U.)
Disclaimer - Haftungsausschluss
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren