Is it time for Democrats to start panicking?
The American Prospect
by Terence Samuel
10/19/07
They can’t stop the war or override the president’s veto on S-CHIP. Harry Reid is less popular in his home state of Nevada than the president is in the country, and, if you listen to the pollsters and the pundits, the Democrats are about to choose one of the most divisive political figures in the Republic’s history to be their 2008 presidential nominee. Which begs the question: When should Democrats begin to panic? The answer is ‘not yet.’ But the truth is that unless they can re-establish some of their 2006 momentum, Democrats may find themselves going into the next election tagged as the party that couldn’t stop Bush when given a chance, or as the party that did not try hard enough...
http://tinyurl.com/28s75v
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Terence+Samuel
by Terence Samuel
10/19/07
They can’t stop the war or override the president’s veto on S-CHIP. Harry Reid is less popular in his home state of Nevada than the president is in the country, and, if you listen to the pollsters and the pundits, the Democrats are about to choose one of the most divisive political figures in the Republic’s history to be their 2008 presidential nominee. Which begs the question: When should Democrats begin to panic? The answer is ‘not yet.’ But the truth is that unless they can re-establish some of their 2006 momentum, Democrats may find themselves going into the next election tagged as the party that couldn’t stop Bush when given a chance, or as the party that did not try hard enough...
http://tinyurl.com/28s75v
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Terence+Samuel
rudkla - 22. Okt, 17:31
