Global Warming Challenges the Unitary Executive
Kelpie Wilson writes: "On April 2, 2007 the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State of Massachusetts in the landmark global warming case, Massachusetts v. EPA. Environmentalists were pleased that the high court ruled on the merits of the case, agreeing that carbon dioxide meets the definition of a pollutant and that the EPA has run out of excuses for not regulating it. But some legal scholars were even more gratified by another aspect of the case, the court's ruling on the right of the plaintiffs to sue, known as their 'standing.'"
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041507Y.shtml
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Kelpie+Wilson
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041507Y.shtml
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Kelpie+Wilson
rudkla - 15. Apr, 19:02
