World-News

Auch in anderen Gefängnissen wie in Bagram werden Hunderte von "feindlichen Kämpfern" unbegrenzt und ohne Rechte willkürlich festgehalten.

http://www.telepolis.de/tp/r4/artikel/22/22143/1.html

http://www.omega-news.info/lobby_und_demokratie.pdf

--------

Verfassungsgerichts-Präsident warnt vor Gefahren des Lobbyismus
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/1618207/

Find more info about Congressman Ron Paul at http://www.house.gov/paul/

A list of articles published by the Congressman is at his government website http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/welcome.htm


Congressman Ron Paul Admits Conspiracy to Create Tyrannical World Government

http://911exposed.com/ (further down, Ron Paul introduces a bill to abolish the Federal Reserve)

Eric Rainbolt - audience member asking question of Congressman Paul at event near Austin, Texas on August 30th, 2003: "Congressman Paul, I have a question..."

Moderator: "Over here." (pointing to Eric Rainbolt.)

Eric Rainbolt: "Great! If we can take a look at the big picture, could you tell us, the people in this room, any information that you may have of an international and deceptive conspiracy to overthrow the American Republic and its Constitution & Bill Of Rights in order to set up and usher in a totalitarian World Government likely espoused under the UN also.."?

Congressman Paul: " He asked if there was an international conspiracy to overthrow our government. The answer is "Yes". I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Goverment, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!..."

Visit the link below to see the video of the meeting: http://www.propagandamatrix.com/260903ronpaul.html
http://www.freepressinternational.com/ronpaul.html


Informant: Scott Munson

I also had a letter from my MP Hugo Swire (tory) who gave me a similar comment, plus a comment about "everyone needing mobile phones" that annoyed me intensely - hence my attached diplomatic letter in response.

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/mr_swire_20_2_06.doc

Jane



Dear Mr Swire

Thank you very much for your letter of 16th February 2006, kindly setting out your reasons for your support of Mr David Curry’s Private members’ Bill regarding Mobile Phone Masts.

I am in agreement with all but one of the comments you have made, and that is, in your final paragraph you say, “…we all want to be able to use mobile phones.” With the greatest respect to you as my valued MP, this statement is not correct, the truth is, for many important reasons, huge numbers of people are choosing not to own or use mobile phones. A few of the categories of people not owning/using mobile technology are:

1. People who have already suffered benign or malignant brain tumours will have been strongly advised by their doctors against using mobile phones. People with epilepsy and other serious neurological health problems will also have been strongly advised by their doctors against the use of mobile phones, as it has been known for a long time now that mobile phones can aggravate/worsen these health problems.

I have enclosed a copy email reporting on a new study imminently to be published in the International Journal of Oncology by Dr Lennard Hardell and colleagues, showing statistically significant increases in the risk of benign brain tumours, especially acoustic neuromas, following the use of mobile telephones. WLAN and DECT phones also use pulsing microwave technology and enclosed is a letter from Dr Gerd Oberfeld MD, Head of the Salzburg Public Health Department banning the use of WLAN and DECT phones/equipment in schools or kindergartens.

2. People who are suffering from Electro-Sensitivity will be avoiding using mobile phones or being near anyone else using mobile phones. Myself and many others in Devon, (and throughout Britain), have taken part in some of the truly independent research currently being carried out, but as yet unpublished. These research test results have proved to others and myself that it is not our imagination, as our bodies do exhibit real physiological effects within minutes of being in the presence of active mobile phones and masts.

3. There are a huge number of people choosing not to use mobile phones for moral and ethical reasons. I have enclosed a copy email that contains an extract from the full article from the magazine ‘Ethical Consumer’, www.ethicalconsumer.org, setting out the serious problems brought to the people/environment of the Democratic Republic of Congo, by the mining of coltan used in mobile phones.

4. There are large numbers of people who regard the intrusion of mobile phones an invasion of their personal peace and privacy so do not allow their use on their property. As these people find mobile technology completely unacceptable, they also choose not to own or use mobile phones.

Being an intelligent, interesting person as well as my MP, I appreciate that you are always in great demand, sometimes in areas away from your own constituency. However, I cannot help being very disappointed that you will not be present to vote on this crucially important Bill that affects the whole country.

I have read a great deal about ordinary people’s concern about masts and health throughout the whole of the country, including Scotland. If it is to ordinary Scottish people you will be speaking on the 3rd March next, I would bet that if they were given the straight choice of you speaking in Scotland or voting in London on Mr Curry’s Bill, the voting in London would win.

I believe that unless the Conservatives act as a strong opposition now, making sure all MPs attend to vote on this Bill, the general public will not believe they have what it takes as a party to truly represent and protect the ordinary person. The Conservatives Telecoms Mast Policy good though it is, cannot make immediate changes for the better – unlike Mr Curry’s Private Members Bill which can – but only if voted in! Actions speak louder than words.

Although disappointed, I am still extremely grateful you have said you will be speaking up for local residents suffering from badly sited masts.

Yours truly,

J D LEE

(excerpt)

I spoke with Chellis Glendenning, author and activist from Chimayo, NM, yesterday (on the telephone). She said that her villagers are making great progress in their efforts to oppose a cell phone tower which had suddenly popped up while Chellis was travelling outside of the country. I'll try to collect the relevant details to provide as a fuller news story.

In the mean time, you may be interested in the below article links.

James River Martin


Invisibility and Invasiveness of the Cell Phone
by Chellis Glendinning "http://www.hopedance.org/archive/issue35/articles/30.html"

Locating Chellis An interview with Chellis Glendinning
by Beth Burrows
http://www.talkingleaves.org/f01chellis.htm

Hear Tell: Invisibility, Invasiveness, and the Cell Phone
by Chellis Glendinning
http://www.energyfields.org/impacts/chellis.html

Chimayo, New Mexico, USA
http://chimayo.org/

--------

Wireless Action Network of New Mexico (WAN-NM) is a communications network which links and connects New Mexicans who are working on public education about the real and potential health risks associated with electromagnetic radiation exposures from wireless technologies and/or actively opposing cell phone base-station (tower) sitings, Wi-Fi installations, and other wireless communications instalations.

Anyone in New Mexico who shares this interest and purpose is welcome to participate in this group.

The group's home page is at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/wireless-action/

REMEMBER: You can read and participate in this forum without receiving e-mail, by choosing to read the archive, which is always current. If you have any trouble selecting this option, or joining, please let us know and we will try to assist.

Please introduce yourself and your activities and/or interests concerning electromagnetic radiation from wireless technologies upon joining the forum.

And please invite others to join!

THANK YOU!

WAN,
New Mexico


Informant: James River Martin



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Chellis+Glendinning

A recent vote in Congress endorsing standardized, electronically readable driver's licenses has raised fears about whether the proposal would usher in what amounts to a national ID card.

http://tinyurl.com/qgoux


From Information Clearing House

Christopher Booker's notebook

(Filed: 26/02/2006)

Thanks to a diktat from John Prescott, thousands of elected councillors have been shocked to be instructed by council officials that they are no longer permitted to represent the views of the communities which elected them. The bizarre consequences of this extraordinary bid to undermine local democracy are highlighted by four recent examples from just one county, Shropshire.

When Aggie Caesar-Homden was last September elected to Oswestry borough council, to represent the residents of the village of West Felton, she found herself at the centre of a local planning row. The parish council was up in arms over a 50-foot-high Orange mobile phone mast which had suddenly appeared on the edge of the village, blocking the view to the Berwyn mountains.

The villagers' objection was not to the mast in principle, but that its erection was in clear breach of planning rules. Of 10 procedures required by the rules for phone masts, nine had not been complied with. The mast was illegal. But when Councillor Caesar-Homden raised this on behalf of the parish council she was told by senior council officials that it was not her role to speak for her electors. Since she was now an Oswestry councillor, she must support her council.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/26/nbook26.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/26/ixhome.html
(excerpt)

23.02.2006

Hamburger Klimaforscher präsentieren neueste Modellergebnisse für das kommende Jahrhundert.

http://www.sonnenseite.com/index.php?pageID=6&news:oid=n4645

Wie sehr haben wir uns schon an das Neusprech der „Schönen Neuen Welt“ gewöhnt! An die Begriffe aus den Werkstätten der Akzeptanzforscher, Militärs und Werbepsychologen! Menschen werden durch „schlanke Produktion“ nicht etwa entlassen sondern „freigesetzt“ und ein Pestizid ist ein „Pflanzenschutzmittel“. Ein versehentlicher Angriff auf die Zivilbevölkerung ist ein „Kollateralschaden“ und „Friendly Fire“ ist der Spezialfall eines „Kollateralschadens“, bei der „intelligente“ Waffensysteme Feind und Freund verwechselt haben. Statt Atomkraft sprechen wir von „Kernkraft“, statt Entgiftung sagen wir „Dekontamination“ und aus dem Katastrophenschutz wurde der harmloser klingende „Notfallschutz“.

http://www.sonnenseite.com/index.php?pageID=18&article:oid=a4640