Legitimate outrage comes when the president acts in flagrant violation of the Constitution, defending his actions unconvincingly, disingenuously or not at all
Constitutional Cafeteria
It seems that Bush has asserted the right to ignore, as the Boston Globe puts it, "vast swaths of the law" simply because he thinks that these laws are unconstitutional. Michael Kinsley writes, "Legitimate outrage comes when the president acts in flagrant violation of the Constitution, defending his actions unconvincingly, disingenuously or not at all."
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050506F.shtml
It seems that Bush has asserted the right to ignore, as the Boston Globe puts it, "vast swaths of the law" simply because he thinks that these laws are unconstitutional. Michael Kinsley writes, "Legitimate outrage comes when the president acts in flagrant violation of the Constitution, defending his actions unconvincingly, disingenuously or not at all."
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050506F.shtml
rudkla - 5. Mai, 23:06
