Forest - Wald

Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2007

Protest gegen Strom und Diesel aus Palmöl

Der Umweltdachverband Friends of the Earth International (FoEI) hat von der EU gefordert, die Produktion von Strom und Diesel aus Palmöl zu stoppen. Die Nachfrage aus der EU führe zur "verstärkten Umwandlung von Regenwäldern in Plantagen, hohem Pestizideinsatz und Landkonflikten". Allein Indonesien und Malaysia planten eine Verdoppelung ihrer Palmöl-Plantagen auf rund 20 Millionen Hektar, eine Fläche fünfmal so groß wie die Niederlande.

http://www.ngo-online.de/ganze_nachricht.php?H=N&Nr=16744



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Palmöl
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Regenwald

Samstag, 6. Oktober 2007

INDONESIA TO PLANT 79 MILLION TREES IN ONE DAY

Indonesia, which has destroyed vast tracts of forest, will plant 79 million trees in a single day ahead of the U.N. climate change summit in Bali in December, an official said on Thursday.

http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSJAK1608520071004


Informant: NHNE

--------

Plant trees, lots of them, you can never plant enough!
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3515163/

Freitag, 5. Oktober 2007

World Bank Found to Have Seriously Violated Own Rules as Sought to Raze Congo's Rainforests

ALERT VICTORY/UPDATE

TODAY World Bank Found to Have Seriously Violated Own Rules as Sought to Raze Congo's Rainforests

Rainforest Portal a project of Ecological Internet, Inc.

http://www.rainforestportal.org -- Rainforest Portal http://www.rainforestportal.org/news/ -- Rainforest Newsfeed

October 5, 2007 OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY by Dr. Glen Barry, Ecological Internet

A leaked report by the World Bank's independent inspection panel has found the World Bank gravely broke its own rules in regard to rainforest policies and projects pursued since 2002 in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The World Bank encouraged foreign companies to destructively log DRC's rainforests, endangering the lives of thousands of Congolese Pygmies; misled Congo's government about the value of their forests, and repeatedly broke their own rules regarding natural habitat and indigenous protections.

Congo's rainforests are the second largest in the world, hold some 8% of the Earth's carbon, and possess critical global ecosystems containing rich biodiversity. These forests provide medicines, shelter, timber and food for 40 million people. When the World Bank reentered the Congo in 2002, after years of war, it said industrial forestry could contribute to the country's recovery. It rushed through new forestry laws, divided the country's rainforests into logging zones, and along with the British government aimed to create a favorable climate for industrial logging. These efforts have now been discredited.

This revelation of Bank corruption in order to ensure Western access to ancient rainforest timbers is a victory, albeit sad and impartial, as the Pygmies' rights and livelihoods are safe for now from illegally promoted inappropriate development of the country’s rainforests by the World Bank. It is a victory for Rainforest Foundation -- UK, whose persistent efforts to highlight the World Bank's bad faith efforts in the DRC have paid off. And perhaps the mighty Congo rainforest is secure for awhile from more misguided World Bank forest conservation policies and projects that intensify industrial logging.

And lastly, it is a victory for Ecological Internet's action network (you!), who in support of Pygmies filing the inspection panel claim, the Rainforest Foundation, and out of a desire to keep DRC's rainforests intact; launched one of our largest email action protests ever, as tens of thousands of protests emails were sent by thousands of protestors. The protest alert in December of 2005 had such high levels of participation that we crashed our server handling the volume!

The alert just prior to the World Bank Board's consideration of Congo rainforest policy called for an Inspection Panel "investigation into claims by the 'Pygmy' indigenous peoples that you have failed to take into account how your plans would impact people depending on the forest for their survival... The World Bank is laying the basis for the destruction of Congo's rainforests, and it has breached many of its own internal safeguard policies in the process". These allegations have been borne out in their entirety.

It is clear that the World Bank must completely rethink their forest policy in the DRC and the world. Industrial logging must be rejected and replaced with an emphasis upon community development based upon standing, intact rainforests. Further, it is clear that the World Bank has been discredited, shown to not be a good faith participant in world efforts to protect the world's remaining primary and old-growth forests. As such, they must be disqualified from further administration of GEF and proposed Forest/Carbon protection monies. Expect an alert to this effect shortly... g.b.

To comment: http://www.rainforestportal.org/issues/2007/10/world_bank_seri ously_violated.asp


RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:

ITEM #1 Title: Country World Bank accused of razing Congo forests Internal report says mass logging threatens Pygmies; Findings are embarrassing for British government Source: Copyright 2007, Guardian, UK Date: October 5, 2007 Byline: John Vidal

The World Bank encouraged foreign companies to destructively log the world's second largest forest, endangering the lives of thousands of Congolese Pygmies, according to a report on an internal investigation by senior bank staff and outside experts. The report by the independent inspection panel, seen by the Guardian, also accuses the bank of misleading Congo's government about the value of its forests and of breaking its own rules.

Congo's rainforests are the second largest in the world after the Amazon, locking nearly 8% of the planet's carbon and having some of its richest biodiversity. Nearly 40 million people depend on the forests for medicines, shelter, timber and food.

The report into the bank's activities in Democratic Republic of Congo since 2002 follows complaints made two years ago by an alliance of 12 Pygmy groups. The groups claimed that the bank-backed system of awarding vast logging concessions to companies to exploit the forests was causing "irreversible harm".

It will be discussed at board level in the World Bank within weeks and may lead to a complete rethink of how forestry in the DRC is practised.

It is particularly embarrassing for the British government, which is a development partner of the bank and its third largest financial contributor. It encouraged the bank to intervene in the Congo forests with export-driven industrial logging and has earmarked £50m for further Congo basin forestry aid.

When the bank moved back into Congo in 2002, after years of war which cost up to 4 million lives, it said industrial forestry could contribute most strongly to the country's recovery. In its rush to reform the economy it devised new forestry laws, divided the county into zones and aimed to create a favourable climate for industrial logging.

But although the bank is legally committed to protecting the environment, and trying to alleviate poverty, the panel found that the policies it imposed on the Congo were having the opposite social and environmental effects:

• An area of 600,000 square kilometres (232,000 square miles) of forest was earmarked for logging companies.

• The bank failed to address critical social and environmental issues.

• It ignored between 250,000 and 600,000 Pygmies believed to be living in the Congolese forests, even though their presence was well known and documented.

• It put the Pygmies in serious potential harm.

Criticism is made of the forestry reforms that the bank imposed in return for loans of more than $450m. Initially, said the panel, "the bank provided [to the government] estimates of export revenue from logging concessions that turned out to be far too high. This encouraged a focus on reform of the forestry system at the expense of pursuing sustainable uses of forests, the potential for community forests and for conservation.

For the most part foreign companies, or local companies controlled by foreigners, have been the beneficiaries of this," the report said.

In a scathing analysis of the bank's economic reasoning, the panel said the bank had "distorted the real economic value of the country's forests" by looking solely at the tax and revenue that increased industrial logging might generate. "There seems to have been little action to support alternative uses of the forest resources," it said.

The panel travelled deep into the forest to take evidence from the Pygmy communities, who told it they were not consulted before the bank launched its wide-ranging forestry reforms.

One Pygmy leader told the panel: "We are being made poor in every aspect ... the [logging] company prevents us from going into the forests." Another said that the company had bought the land so that people could no longer live in the forests.

"Roads are going ever deeper into the forests, opening it up. We are increasingly deprived of our foods and drugs. We have never seen anything from the bank except promises," said a third.

Research by non-government groups last year showed that 12 foreign-owned or foreign-controlled companies were encouraged by the bank to dominate the entire industry. Some had concessions of more than 5m hectares, and all included Pygmy communities in their holdings. The bank is reviewing the legality of many of these concessions.

Yesterday international groups that have worked with Congolese communities said they were shocked by the panel's findings.

"The Pygmies must be fully involved in developing any future plans for the forest, and the bank need to find ways of helping them uphold their rights, rather than helping logging companies to destroy them," said Simon Counsell, director of the Rainforest Foundation.

"The World Bank must change drastically its forest policies. Industrial logging is not contributing to poverty reduction, while its expansion undermines future financial benefits for environmental services," said Staphan van Praet, the Africa forest campaigner for Greenpeace International.


ITEM #2 Title: Congo’s Pygmies vindicated as official watchdog condemns World Bank’s role in Africa’s great rainforest Source: Press Release, Rainforest Foundation -- UK Date: October 4, 2007

PRESS RELEASE EMBARGO: 4th October 2007. 00.01 hrs Congo’s Pygmies vindicated as official watchdog condemns World Bank’s role in Africa’s great rainforest

An unreleased report of the World Bank Inspection Panel obtained today by the Rainforest Foundation shows that the World Bank has committed grave errors in its projects in the rainforests of the Democratic Republic of Congo, which are the second largest on Earth after the Amazon [1]. The Panel’s investigation was undertaken after a formal complaint was submitted by a number of organisation’s working with Congo’s indigenous Pygmy people, who expressed their concern about the impact of Bank-funded activities in the forests which they inhabit [2]. An area of rainforest the size of France is at risk.

The report finds that two projects funded by the Bank since
2002 would have promoted massive industrial exploitation of Congo’s rainforests for timber production, potentially turning the country into ‘Africa’s premier timber producer’. However, the Inspection Panel also finds that there was inadequate consideration of the “many important socio-economic and environmental issues of forest us” at the time that the Bank projects were prepared and started; that the Bank had not even identified the fact that Congo’s forests were inhabited by indigenous people, and had only given ‘limited attention’ to the fact that some 40 million other people (mostly subsistence farmers) also depend on Congo’s forests for their survival. As well as threatening the environment, the projects would also probably not serve to help alleviate poverty; the Panel has found that the Bank misled the Congolese government into believing that the revenues from logging its rainforests would be much higher than were likely in reality.

Most damningly for the Bank, the Panel has found that Bank staff broke many of the agency’s own internal ‘safeguard’ policies, which are designed to protect the environment, natural habitats, and the rights of people living in the areas affected by Bank projects. Bank staff ‘downgraded’ projects to lower levels of potential environmental risk, thus reducing the level of environmental assessment required, and then anyway failed to carry out environmental and social impacts before the projects started.

The Panel also finds that, whilst the Bank has repeatedly claimed that it is helping to bring Congo’s existing and mostly illegal logging operations under control, especially by reviewing the legality of all the existing 150 or so logging companies, there had been serious flaws in this process, with inadequate management of it by the Bank. The fate of around 15 million hectares of rainforest (about the size of England), some of it inhabited by Pygmies, could be determined by this flawed ‘review’ of logging concessions.

Simon Counsell, Director of the Rainforest Foundation, said;

“The Panel’s report is a major victory for the ‘Pygmy’ peoples of the Congo whose rights and livelihoods would be seriously harmed by inappropriate development of the country’s rainforests. We are now calling on governments to put pressure on the World Bank Board to realise the gravity of the report and ddemand immediate action to safeguard the Congo forests and the 40 million people depending on them.”

Notes to editors

[1] The report results from a year-long investigation by the Panel, which serves as an official but independent ‘watchdog’ over the activities of the Bank, the world’s largest development funding agency. The Panel’s report on the Congolese rainforests would probably be made publicly available at the end of October.

[2] The Request for Inspection submitted by 12 Congolese activists can be found on the Inspection Panel website: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTINSPECTIONPANEL/Resource s/RequestforInspectionEnglish.pdf.

For further information contact:

Simon Counsell, the Rainforest Foundation UK T- 020 7485 0193 M- 07941 899 579 E: simonc@rainforestuk.com

Cath Long, Rainforest Foundation UK Programme Director T- 020 7485 0193 M – 07932 635 798 E – cathl@rainforestuk.com

--------

World Bank "Encouraged" Razing Congo Forests

John Vidal for The Guardian UK reports that "the World Bank encouraged foreign companies to destructively log the world's second-largest forest, endangering the lives of thousands of Congolese Pygmies, according to a report on an internal investigation by senior bank staff and outside experts."

http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/100507EA.shtml



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=rainforest
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Congo
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Glen+Barry
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=John+Vidal

Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2007

Open Letter of Concern Regarding RAN's Support for Ancient Forest Logging

ALERT BACKGROUND

RAINFOREST CONSERVATION NEWS TODAY

Open Letter of Concern Regarding RAN's Support for Ancient Forest Logging, and Notification of Impending Campaign

Rainforest Portal a project of Ecological Internet, Inc.

http://www.rainforestportal.org /-- Rainforest Portal http://www.rainforestportal.org/news/ -- Rainforest Newsfeed

October 4, 2007 OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY by Dr. Glen Barry, Ecological Internet

Ecological Internet has identified Rainforest Action Network
(RAN) of San Francisco, USA as the next target of our "End Ancient Forest Logging Campaign". As the largest and historically most active rainforest conservation organization in America; RAN continues to support industrial ancient forest logging, suggests FSC certification of such practices ensures "sustainability", and has already sold out British Columbia's ancient forests to such practices. They must not be allowed to do so again.

Targeting a group that, however misguided, has long been our brethren is difficult but unavoidable. Climate change will not be solved without preserving fully intact ancient rainforest carbon sinks. These carbon sinks will not remain in place unless all ancient forest logging -- including selective, certified, sustainable or ecosystem management -- is ended. The absolutely necessary global ecological goal of ending ancient forest logging to stop climate change is difficult but not unattainable.

Even countries rich in tropical rainforests are receptive to being compensated to end their industrial development. Sadly we find Rainforest Action Network, Greenpeace and WWF amongst the greatest impediments to achieving these policies. Consider the attached open letter to RAN background for a major escalation of this campaign which will commence shortly. At that time we will be asking for your organization's support, continued participation in on-line protests, and involvement in additional protest tactics. Stay tuned...

Dr. Glen Barry


October 4, 2007

Mr. Michael Brune Executive Director Rainforest Action Network
221 Pine Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 USA mbrune@ran.org

Re: Open letter of concern regarding RAN's support for ancient forest logging, and notification of impending campaign

Dear Mr. Brune,

I am writing on behalf of Ecological Internet's global ancient forest protection network to express grave concern with Rainforest Action Network's (RAN) continued support for "sustainable" first time logging of ancient forests (defined as primary and old-growth forests). And to inform you that we intend to intensify our "End Ancient Forest Logging" campaign, targeting RAN until your organization disavows industrial first time logging of primary and old-growth forests and joins efforts to end industrial logging of all such remaining ancient forests.

As the largest, most visible rainforest campaigning organization in the United States; we are extremely distressed at your failure to embrace the current groundswell of concern regarding climate change and the major role ancient forest protection, including but not limited to rainforests, has in its mitigation. RAN is actively impeding a broad based, international movement to end ancient forest logging as a keystone response to global warming by clinging to old failed forest conservation initiatives, and continues to issue misleading clichés regarding industrial logging of ancient forests contributing to environmental protection.

RAN continues to make false, scientifically indefensible, statements on your web site and within campaign materials regarding the purported environmental benefits of FSC certification of ancient forest logging. A prominent example can be found on your "Old Growth" page at http://ran.org/what_we_do/old_growth/, where under "Good Wood" you state: "Wood certified by the Forest Stewardship Council
(FSC) is sustainably obtained ..." No one, not even FSC, suggests certified logging of primary and old-growth forests is environmentally or ecologically sustainable, claiming only it is "responsibly managed".

Further, RAN suggests prominently on your home page at http://www.ran.org/ that you are for both "protection" and "sustainable logging" of ancient forests. Certified industrial scale first time logging of ancient rainforests is not "protection" by any reasonable definition. And it is certainly not ecologically sustainable. You appear to be confusing preservation with conservation of ancient forests. RAN's approach to forest protection based upon reforming industrial ancient forest logging is outdated, and not based upon ecological science or requirements for global ecological sustainability. It fails to seize the moment of heightened public concern with climate change and global ecological issues in general, and push for protection of all ancient forests as global ecological reserves based upon payments for avoided deforestation and support for small scale, community based eco-forestry activities. The FSC was a great idea gone bad; as it has been usurped by the interests of large scale, commercial logging. We now know all ancient forests are of High Conservation Value; yet, ancient forest logging is most of FSC's future growth.

We are great admirers of past work on behalf of rainforests by RAN, but are distressed by your organization's current direction. In addition to misguided and misleading support that greenwashes continued industrial development of ancient rainforests, RAN has all but stopped doing rainforest campaigning. For the last couple years, it has been difficult to find any trace of current rainforest news of pure rainforest campaigning by RAN on your web site. Rainforests are more in need of protection than ever before yet RAN has essentially discontinued its direct efforts on their behalf. Your recent agri-business campaign is a good start at revamping your lapsed efforts, yet this is but one aspect of rainforest destruction, and it appears you are going it alone rather than working with those active in this arena for years.

While your upcoming "Rainforest Revel" event will undoubtedly be entertaining, RAN has lost their edge in regard to rainforest protection work. We are not convinced that seeing Bob Weir jam on his 60th birthday is translating into rainforest protection, though it certainly is cool. Could it be that throwing good parties, mixing with celebrities, while proposing feel good inadequate policies -- such as we can industrially log ancient forests and protect them too -- is more important than espousing policies adequate to sustain rainforests while protecting the climate and achieving global ecological sustainability? RAN clearly understands the gravity of looming global heating, and has staked out rigorous positions on ending the use of coal, yet has failed miserably to do likewise for ancient forests. Is RAN capable of reflection and change of strategies when current ones are shown to be ineffective?

I am writing to you to inform you that Rainforest Action Network has become a primary target of Ecological Internet's campaign to end ancient forest logging. This disagreement regarding the desirability of logging ancient forests -- be it falsely labeled sustainable, certified or ecosystem management -- has gone beyond being a difference of opinion on how best to save the world’s rainforests to one of ending RAN's damaging misrepresentations and falsehoods. What started out as a few blog entries and essays has now become a full global campaign to change RAN's forest protection policies. We will not let RAN sell-out any further ancient forests for industrial logging such as tragically occurred in British Columbia, Canada.

Consider yourselves "called-out" on your failed rainforest protection policies. We will be actively informing the public, your members, donors and board members of inaccuracies and misstatements in your rainforest protection campaign work; and encouraging them to stop supporting your work until such time as these are remedied. Tens of thousands of people in over 100 countries around the world have already sent over a million protest emails to environmental groups greenwashing ancient forest logging. The full focus of these efforts will now be directed at RAN. We have secured funding and have a number of disruptive non-violent actions readied for such an effort.

It is hoped that this open letter will avert this full out campaign. To do so, we demand from you:

1.) RAN must disassociate itself publicly from any further support for any industrial scaled logging, certified or otherwise, of primary and old-growth forests.

2.) Begin developing a rigorous rainforest campaign, linking full preservation and small scale community based eco-forestry activities that protect large, intact and contiguous rainforests with climate protection; similar in scope and ambition to your coal campaign.

3.) Removal of all scientifically misleading statements from RAN web site and campaign materials falsely suggesting that FSC certified ancient forest logging is "sustainable"; and that "sustainable logging" of ancient forests is compatible with their protection. Noting your web server is currently down, we hope you are doing this now given past expressions of concern.

We very much hope that RAN will successfully reform itself and its message to harness the huge wave of increasing climate change and rainforest awareness sweeping the globe. Together we hope to work with you to develop and achieve rainforest policy that contributes significantly to stopping climate change, that helps to equitably meet local needs, while beginning the process of identifying rainforest policies sufficient to achieve global ecological sustainability.

Warm regards,

Dr. Glen Barry
President Ecological Internet, Inc.



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=ancient+forest
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=logging
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Glen+Barry

Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2007

Amazon Jungle Could Be Lost in 40 Years

The Guardian UK's Ian Sample reports: "The Amazonian wilderness is at risk of unprecedented damage from an ambitious plan to improve transport, communications and power generation in the region, conservationists warned yesterday."

http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/100207EC.shtml



"Zero" Amazon Deforestation Possible by 2015

The Environmental News Network reports that "Halting deforestation in the Amazon rain forest is the objective of nine Brazilian non-governmental organizations (NGO's) that have drafted an ambitious plan to stop clear-cutting in the region within seven years. The groups, which include national affiliates of Greenpeace, WWF and The Nature Conservancy, presented the proposal at an event in Brasilia on Friday attended by Environment Minister Marina Silva, state governors and other authorities."

http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/101007EB.shtml



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Amazon
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=deforestation

Samstag, 29. September 2007

Biofuel Crops Hurt Rain Forests

Timothy Gardner for Reuters reports that "primate scientist Jane Goodall said on Wednesday the race to grow crops for vehicle fuels is damaging rain forests in Asia, Africa and South America and adding to the emissions blamed for global warming."

http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/092807EA.shtml



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=biofuels
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Rain+Forests

Freitag, 21. September 2007

Incentives Offered to Destroy Forests

Julio Godoy for Inter Press Service reports that "Instead of providing positive incentives to tropical nations to conserve their rain forests and so reduce greenhouse gases emissions, the world indirectly gives 'perverse incentives' to destroy them by demanding goods produced by intensive logging, a leading environmental activist says."

http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/092007EC.shtml

--------

Plant trees, lots of them, you can never plant enough!
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/3515163/



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=rain+forest

Samstag, 15. September 2007

Call for Paying Third World Countries to Save Rain Forests

NewKerala.com reports that "Scientists have urged the first world nations to help Third World countries preserve their rain forests. Poor nations must be rewarded for resisting economic pressure to clear rain forests, they said."

http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/091407EB.shtml



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=rain+forest

Protect Canada's Boreal Forest

http://write-a-letter.greenpeace.org/303



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Boreal+Forest
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=kleercut

Amazon Rainforest may go extinct by 2080 if deforestation keeps on

http://www.climateark.org/shared/reader/welcome.aspx?linkid=83802


Informant: NHNE

World-News

Independent Media Source

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Trump and His Allies...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/06/21/trump- and-his-allies-are-clear-a nd-present-danger-american -democracy?utm_source=dail y_newsletter&utm_medium=Em ail&utm_campaign=daily_new sletter_op
rudkla - 22. Jun, 05:09
The Republican Party...
https://truthout.org/artic les/the-republican-party-i s-still-doing-donald-trump s-bidding/?eType=EmailBlas tContent&eId=804d4873-50dd -4c1b-82a5-f465ac3742ce
rudkla - 26. Apr, 05:36
January 6 Committee Says...
https://truthout.org/artic les/jan-6-committee-says-t rump-engaged-in-criminal-c onspiracy-to-undo-election /?eType=EmailBlastContent& eId=552e5725-9297-4a7c-a21 4-53c8c51615a3
rudkla - 4. Mär, 05:38
Georgia Republicans Are...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/02/14/georgi a-republicans-are-delibera tely-attacking-voting-righ ts
rudkla - 15. Feb, 05:03
Now Every Day Is January...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/02/07/now-ev ery-day-january-6-trump-ta rgets-vote-counters
rudkla - 8. Feb, 05:41

Archiv

Mai 2025
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
 
 
 

Status

Online seit 7287 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 22. Jun, 05:09

Credits


Afghanistan
Animal Protection - Tierschutz
AUFBRUCH für Bürgerrechte, Freiheit und Gesundheit
Big Brother - NWO
Brasilien-Brasil
Britain
Canada
Care2 Connect
Chemtrails
Civil Rights - Buergerrechte - Politik
Cuts in Social Welfare - Sozialabbau
Cybermobbing
Datenschutzerklärung
Death Penalty - Todesstrafe
Depleted Uranium Poisoning (D.U.)
Disclaimer - Haftungsausschluss
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren