The Supreme Court has spoken: You have no rights
Liberty & Power
by Robert Higgs
12/22/09
In truth, any ‘constitutionally protected rights’ you are now exercising exist solely at the pleasure and convenience of the rulers. The minute the continuation of your life or liberty no longer pleases them, they will, as the Court’s decision makes clear, simply declare you an unperson to be dealt with as they choose, whether they choose to torture you, confine you in a steel cage for the rest of your life, or peremptorily kill you. They recognize NO rights in anyone (except themselves, of course) that they are bound to respect. This horror is the end to which a brave experiment has come. If the rulers can, at their pleasure, declare ANYONE THEY SELECT a legal unperson, the notion that the United States is a free country is nothing but the sickest of sick jokes...
http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/121551.html
Oath Keepers? I’m still waiting
Albuquerque Libertarian Examiner
by Kent McManigal
01/15/10
No, I am not a fan of the Constitution, although I do believe a Constitutional government would be better than the travesty that attempts to rule us now. I have to wonder, though, if the individual Oath Keepers really understand what ‘unconstitutional’ means. Don’t rely on the black-robed furniture abusers of the Supreme Court to tell you what the Constitution means. They are wrong more often than they are right, and it was never their job to tell you and me what the Constitution means. That authority rests in you and me alone. They stole that ‘authority’ for themselves and have gotten away with it so far...
http://tinyurl.com/yaqrugw
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Supreme+Court
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Constitution
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Robert+Higgs
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Kent+McManigal
by Robert Higgs
12/22/09
In truth, any ‘constitutionally protected rights’ you are now exercising exist solely at the pleasure and convenience of the rulers. The minute the continuation of your life or liberty no longer pleases them, they will, as the Court’s decision makes clear, simply declare you an unperson to be dealt with as they choose, whether they choose to torture you, confine you in a steel cage for the rest of your life, or peremptorily kill you. They recognize NO rights in anyone (except themselves, of course) that they are bound to respect. This horror is the end to which a brave experiment has come. If the rulers can, at their pleasure, declare ANYONE THEY SELECT a legal unperson, the notion that the United States is a free country is nothing but the sickest of sick jokes...
http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/121551.html
Oath Keepers? I’m still waiting
Albuquerque Libertarian Examiner
by Kent McManigal
01/15/10
No, I am not a fan of the Constitution, although I do believe a Constitutional government would be better than the travesty that attempts to rule us now. I have to wonder, though, if the individual Oath Keepers really understand what ‘unconstitutional’ means. Don’t rely on the black-robed furniture abusers of the Supreme Court to tell you what the Constitution means. They are wrong more often than they are right, and it was never their job to tell you and me what the Constitution means. That authority rests in you and me alone. They stole that ‘authority’ for themselves and have gotten away with it so far...
http://tinyurl.com/yaqrugw
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Supreme+Court
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Constitution
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Robert+Higgs
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Kent+McManigal
rudkla - 23. Dez, 11:06
