Interventions without end?
AntiWar.Com
by Pat Buchanan
03/27/07
Stephens believes the successors to Bush and Blair will find they have no option but to intervene to prevent the new world disorder. Perhaps. But given the rage and revulsion Americans feel at having been stampeded into Iraq and pinioned in Baghdad, unable to stop the bleeding but unwilling to walk away in defeat, the American appetite for intervention has probably been sated for a long, long time. U.S. global hegemony is history. Like every nation, America must now choose — between what is vital and worth fighting for, and what may be ‘idealistic,’ but is not worth a war...
http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=10729
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=global+hegemony
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Pat+Buchanan
by Pat Buchanan
03/27/07
Stephens believes the successors to Bush and Blair will find they have no option but to intervene to prevent the new world disorder. Perhaps. But given the rage and revulsion Americans feel at having been stampeded into Iraq and pinioned in Baghdad, unable to stop the bleeding but unwilling to walk away in defeat, the American appetite for intervention has probably been sated for a long, long time. U.S. global hegemony is history. Like every nation, America must now choose — between what is vital and worth fighting for, and what may be ‘idealistic,’ but is not worth a war...
http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=10729
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=global+hegemony
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Pat+Buchanan
rudkla - 27. Mär, 15:46
