Mobile Radio (worldwide) - Mobilfunk (weltweit) Buergerwelle

Dienstag, 4. April 2006

Protect Santa Fe’s Public Libraries from Wireless Technology

By Rebekah Azen

As wireless technology spreads rapidly across the globe, there are many who are concerned about the risks that have been demonstrated to go along with it — for the allure of “freedom” and “convenience” that wireless promises comes loaded with the cost of an invisible yet dangerous health hazard: electromagnetic radiation.

Just 10 years ago we were relatively free of electromagnetic pollution compared to today. On average, we are being exposed to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) pollution 3,000 times what we were in 1996 due to the rapid spread of wireless technology. Cell phones and wireless Internet are the primary culprits of this invasion. Our bodies and our environment are not designed to deal with this man-made electromagnetic assault that is proliferating out of control.

Along with the ever-growing number of cell towers mushrooming out of control are Wi-Fi “hotspots,” focal points of microwave radiation for Internet connectivity, irradiating every living organism within their reach. Wi-Fi is the “new kid on the block,” and it seems that just about every organization and business wants it, thinking it will enhance their reputation and service. The Santa Fe Public Library Board, which sets policy for the library, is now “exploring” a plan to go wireless in order to allow laptop users access to the Internet and possible network services. Everyone ought to be particularly alarmed about this prospect because it (1) presents a phenomenal health hazard, (2) would bar access to those who are electromagnetically sensitive, (3) would undermine the services and functions of the public library by redirecting resources for wireless service, and (4) would threaten the historical and priceless role of the public library and transform it into an Internet café.

A wireless system is dangerous in itself, as it is always emitting microwave radiation 24/7 whether you have a laptop running or not. If you put five or 10 or 20 or 30 or more laptops into a wireless-capable area, the microwave radiation that everyone in that vicinity is exposed to is exponentially increased. In libraries that have already made this change, they are finding that people with laptops are flooding in. This is creating a very high level of microwave radiation exposure, and to say that libraries will become “cesspools of microwave radiation” is not an exaggeration.

I, for one, along with the growing population of electromagnetically sensitive people, will not be using the library under these circumstances. It is simply unacceptable that a library, which is an invaluable public resource for information and knowledge, would be polluted in this way, effectively barring access to many, many people who either don’t want their health endangered or simply can’t risk exposure for fear of serious health consequences. Research indicates that electromagnetic waves and radio frequencies trigger stress responses in cells. These stress responses may create minor biological disturbances such as headache, insomnia, nausea or tinnitus, or lead to serious health consequences such as increased blood sugar, nervous system dysfunction, DNA damage, cancerous tumors, chronic fatigue, respiratory arrest, seizure, heart attack, stroke, etc.

Children are particularly vulnerable to electromagnetic radiation and should not be exposed to cell phones and wireless Internet. Have library administrators forgotten that library services to children are a significant part of public library service? And what about public library staff being exposed continuously? Don’t they have the right to be protected from harmful radiation, and shouldn’t the city of Santa Fe have a policy protecting public employees from excessive EMR pollution?

People who are electromagnetically sensitive are disabled in a way that can hardly be conceived of by most people. The public library is one of the few places that is still accessible for these people, as workplaces, businesses, government buildings, cafés, schools, cities, counties and states are all gearing up to go wireless. In Sweden, electromagnetic sensitivity, better known as electro-hypersensitivity, is recognized as a full-on disability, and though it is not recognized as such in the United States yet, there are state, federal and local laws designed to protect disabled citizens, and they have rights just as anyone else in this society. The public library is a “public” resource, paid for by the public, and everyone has the right to access the library and its resources without health endangerment.

In libraries that are undergoing this wireless transition, they are finding that it is requiring an extraordinary amount of time, energy and money to deal with technical problems, answer patron questions about using the technology, create circulation services for laptops, and purchase laptops. All of these activities redirect what little resources libraries have toward services that are largely unnecessary and that slowly undermine the traditional role of libraries, effectively turning them into Internet cafés.

Do we really “need” wireless Internet? Don’t we already have computer access and Internet access in libraries, and isn’t the intent to provide more access to users simply self-defeating? Providing wireless doesn’t resolve the demand for computer and Internet service in libraries, it only propels it further along. This is the experience of libraries that have gone wireless.

And what about those who don’t have laptops? Is the library going to expend a fortune on laptops (when it could have gone to book purchases and other library services) so that the “disadvantaged” have equal access? Or are we going to relegate “those” people to the public terminals, where they must wait in line while their wealthier brethren can saunter in, demurely pull out their laptops and connect without a fuss? Isn’t this simply catering to those who already “have”? The effort to provide computers in libraries was originally meant to diminish the digital divide and create equity between the “haves” and “have nots.” Librarians need to remember their original intentions in this regard, and they need to remember the role and function of a public library: information, equity and access.

Wireless Internet does not mesh with or enhance the mission of the public library. It only creates serious health hazards, erodes the quality of library service, and threatens the foundation upon which public libraries have stood for over 100 years in this country. Fifty years of research and thousands of articles from medical journals and other reputable scientific sources from around the world on the health hazards of electromagnetic pollution should be enough, alone, to dissuade library administration that this is an issue not to be ignored. The public library should be the bastion of education, public knowledge and information that is its mission. Mindless obsequiousness and capitulation to wireless technology (or, for that matter, any technology that is passively and uncritically accepted) is not within the purview of the public library mission. Efforts to improve library services are sought after and appreciated, but it needs to be understood that wireless Internet is not a step forward.

The time to stop this invasion is now. Please contact the Santa Fe Public Library Board president, Michele Huff, at 982-6484 or e-mail her at hmhuff9@earthlink.net. You can also contact the new mayor and city councilors. Let them know that you’re opposed to a wireless invasion of the Santa Fe Public Library system and exhort them to keep our libraries intact, safe and accessible for all. For more information on the hazards of EMR proliferation, visit Wireless Action Network of New Mexico at http://wireless-action.blogspot.com.

http://sunmonthly.com/Azen.htm


Informant: James River Martin

--------

Health risks of Wi-Fi and WLAN on our health
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1122031/

Protect Santa Fe’s Public Libraries from Wireless Technology
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/1790941/

Health fears lead schools to dismantle wireless networks
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/2957963/

Mobilfunk im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kommerz, Gesundheit und demokratischer Kultur

Neben den enormen wirtschaftlichen Interessen der Mobilfunkindustrie haben Jugendschutz, Gesundheitsvorsorge, Bürgerrechte und Naturschutz keine Priorität. Führende Experten beleuchten die Schattenseite des "mobilen Megabooms". Die Umweltanwältin des Landes Steiermark, Frau MMag. Ute Pöllinger lädt zu einer Informationsveranstaltung ein unter dem Titel

MOBILFUNK
im Spannungsfeld zwischen
Kommerz, Gesundheit und demokratischer Kultur

26. April 2006
14.30 –17.30 Uhr
Kapfenberg, Festsaal Haus der Begegnung „Schirmitzbühel“

Referenten:

Medizin: Dr. Gerd Oberfeld, Umweltmediziner des Landes Salzburg
Referent für Umweltmedizin der Österr. Ärztekammer

Recht: Dr. E. Ch. Schöpfer, Österr. Inst. für Menschenrechte, Salzburg

Baurecht: Mag. Andrea Teschinegg FA 13B Baurecht

Schule: Mag. Harald Gerstgrasser, BORG Bad Aussee

Gemeinden: Bgm. Otto Marl, Bad Aussee

Moderation: Umweltanwältin Fr. MMag. Ute Pöllinger

Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier:

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/a_presse_einladung.doc
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/a_einladung.pdf
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/a_plakat_kapfenberg.pdf
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/a_plakat_folgeseite.pdf

Montag, 3. April 2006

'Diabolical' prospect

By Sukhi Anand

Children as young as two could be taken out of their nursery and primary schools in Ruislip as fears grow about the construction of a mobile phone mast.

The proposed site for the mast, revealed earlier this month, is on West End Road, next to Ruislip Rugby Club and the Growing Trees Nursery, and near Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School in Herlwyn Avenue.

Councillor Dougals Mills (Con, Manor) is at the forefront of the campaign to stop the mast from being built.

He sent a letter informing residents in March.

He said: "My children went to Sacred Heart and this mast is bad news for the school, the environment and a disaster for the nursery."

Councillor Mills joined forces with councillors from other parties to write to the mobile phone giants.

He said: "We want to show that we are united against this matter.

"We are hoping Orange will see sense and realise the strength of local opposition."

Teachers, residents and councillors have started a petition and collected 650 names so far.

David Manley, 52, headteacher of the Sacred Heart school, said: "The position they are suggesting for the mast is where we have had a new footpath built as part of our Safer Routes to School project.

"We know there isn't definite medical evidence suggesting masts are unhealthy, but it will cut down visibility in the area so drivers won't be able to see the children."

Omega there is definite medical evidence suggesting masts are unhealthy. See under:
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Wissenschaft+zu+Mobilfunk/
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Cancer+Cluster
http://www.buergerwelle.de/body_science.html


The manager of Growing Trees Nursery, Helen Stoneham, 27, is worried parents will stop using the day care facility if plans go ahead.

She said: "To have something go up here would be diabolical.

"Parents are not happy about the prospect.

"There is nothing that says there is a definite health risk but nothing says there isn't one either."

Orange, the phone company which wants to erect the mast, has been testing opinion in the area.

It was sent a letter from Hillingdon Council's planning department warning that "any installation in this location is likely to be contentious."

Rebecca D'Arcy from Orange's community affairs department, said: "We appreciate that there has been a high level of objection to this mast and we do understand people's concerns.

"Over the coming weeks Orange will consider this feedback when deciding how to proceed with the application.

"Although we understand people's concerns about the health issues surrounding mobile phone masts, there is currently no evidence to suggest ill health despite many years of research."

1:19pm today

© Copyright 2001-2006 Newsquest Media Group

http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/regional/display.php?artid=718718&FROMPAPER=hillingdontimes.co.uk

Mobile phone mast move

North Wales

Apr 3 2006

Daily Post

A CONTROVERSIAL mobile phone mast, removed from the roof of a North Wales school, is to be replaced with one in an isolated field surrounded by trees.

Orange PCS Ltd moved its mast from the roof of Broughton Junior School following protests by parents worried about the possible health effects.

It has dropped plans to erect a replacement at Bretton Lodge Farm and is now seeking planning consent to put a 20-metre-high lattice mast with three antennae and two dishes in open countryside on land at Green End Farm in Broughton.

In a report to be considered by Flintshire County Council's planning and development control committee on Wednesday, planning officials say that it should go ahead.

The proposed new site was within open countryside 200 metres to the south of the village boundary and 300 metres to the west of the dwelling at Green End Farm.

But Broughton and Bretton community councillors remain unhappy.

© owned by or licensed to Trinity Mirror Plc 2006

http://tinyurl.com/ko224

Sonntag, 2. April 2006

Téléphoner peut nuire à votre santé

Nice-matin (Dimanche 2 Avril 2006)

Télévision Suisse Romande Emission Temps Présent:
Téléphoner peut nuire à votre santé
http://www.next-up.org/main.php?param=dernieresinfos&date_news=2006-04-02

Samstag, 1. April 2006

You Don´t Deserve Brain Cancer - You Deserve The Facts

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1388959/

Freitag, 31. März 2006

Rio Arriba County votes to stop construction of cell-phone towers

By ANDY LENDERMAN - The New Mexican March 31, 2006

The Rio Arriba County Commission has voted to temporarily stop the construction of cell-phone and other commercial towers within county limits.

The ban will last until Jan. 30, 2007, giving the county time to rewrite county rules that govern those towers. The county is currently developing a comprehensive plan, zoning ordinances and other land-use regulations.

continued >>> http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/41626.html

Informant: James River Martin

North Walsham Road phone mast victory

PETER WALSH
31 March 2006 10:28

Campaigners were today celebrating after councillors rejected plans for a mobile phone mast to be sited in the north of the city.

Telecommunications giant O2 had wanted to install a slimline mast on a verge next to 147 North Walsham Road.

But Broadland District Council's planning committee was unanimous in its decision to reject the application because the prominence of the mast would have a “significant detrimental impact upon the character and appearance of the site and more widely the surrounding area as a whole”.

The planning committee's decision came after it received 141 separate letters of objection from people living in the area in addition to a petition with 432 signatures on it.

Trevor Weinle, 58, who lives near to the proposed site, was one of the people responsible for the campaign.

He was at the planning meeting and was delighted the council has decided to reject the application.

“We've done a lot of campaigning and local people have been brilliant,” he said.

“I'm pleased the planning authority has been on our side and as far as I'm concerned the system has worked well.”

But Mr Weinle, who spoke on behalf of the other objectors at the meeting, said he did not expect this to be an end to the matter.

“What worries me is that O2 now has the right to appeal this decision and can take that to an outside inspector and the whole thing can be overturned,” he said.

“We're very pleased it's gone this far; this has been a great day for the whole community, but we do see it as a battle won rather than the whole war.

“O2 may yet install a mast on this site or another somewhere in the vicinity and other operators are waiting in the wings for a slice of the action.”

The Evening News' Put Masts on Hold campaign has fought against the installation of mobile phone masts near homes and schools until it is proved they are safe.

Are you fighting against plans to put up a phone mast in your neighbourhood? Call Peter Walsh at the Evening News on (01603) 772439 or email peter.walsh@archant.co.uk

Copyright © 2006 Archant Regional. All rights reserved.

http://tinyurl.com/jtsbt

Mobile phone mast rejected

31 March 2006 15:41

Campaigners are celebrating after councillors rejected plans for a mobile phone mast to the north of Norwich.

Telecommunications giant O2 wanted to install a slimline mast on a verge next to 147 North Walsham Road.

But Broadland District Council's planning committee was unanimous in its decision to reject the application because the prominence of the mast would have a “significant detrimental impact upon the character and appearance of the site and more widely the surrounding area as a whole”.

The planning committee's decision came after it received 141 separate letters of objection from people living in the area in addition to a petition with 432 signatures on it.

Trevor Weinle, 58, who lives near to the proposed site, was one of the people responsible for the campaign. He was at the planning meeting and was delighted the council has decided to reject the application.

“We've done a lot of campaigning and local people have been brilliant,” he said. “I'm pleased the planning authority has been on our side and as far as I'm concerned the system has worked well.”

But Mr Weinle, who spoke on behalf of the other objectors at the meeting, said he did not expect this to be an end to the matter.

“What worries me is that O2 now has the right to appeal this decision and can take that to an outside inspector and the whole thing can be overturned,” he said. “We're very pleased it's gone this far; this has been a great day for the whole community, but we do see it as a battle won rather than the whole war.

“O2 may yet install a mast on this site or another somewhere in the vicinity and other operators are waiting in the wings for a slice of the action.”

Copyright © 2006 Archant Regional. All rights reserved.

http://tinyurl.com/r42c7

--------

North Walsham Road phone mast victory
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/1773967/

BLUNDER LETS IN MOBILE MAST

By Richard Wright

BUREAUCRATIC bungling has led to a mobile phone mast getting the go-ahead, despite being turned down by councillors. Because the IW Council did not write to the company within the statutory 56-day time limit, the mast won approval, even though planners rejected the application by telecommunications giant 3G. The mistake was revealed by a BBC News investigation as one of a total of 66 by planning departments across southern England. In October the council refused permission for the 12-metre mast carrying three antennae, a receiver dish and radio equipment housing on the grass verge near the junction of Long Lane and Staplers Road, Newport. It decided the installation was too prominent and would add to visual clutter. Planners were not satisfied other sites had been investigated. Objections were also raised by the Island branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE). However, this week work on erecting the mast was being completed by 3G engineers. CPRE chairman Prof Dennis Russell said in his letter to planners: "This simply adds to the clutter of ugly poles, signs and huts finding their way onto our roadsides and does nothing to improve the appearance of the approaches to the Island's county town. "Such an intrusion into the character of the area so prominently visible and close to residences, should be refused." This week he added: "The council needs to ensure this sort of mistake can never happen again." IW Council development control manager Andrew Pegram said: "Even one clerical mistake of this kind is too many and measures have been taken to prevent this happening again. "However, this incident should be put in the context of more than 100 mobile phone mast developments on the Island, which have been processed correctly."

31 March 2006

http://www.iwcp.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=1252&ArticleID=1414205

World-News

Independent Media Source

User Status

Du bist nicht angemeldet.

Suche

 

Aktuelle Beiträge

Trump and His Allies...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/06/21/trump- and-his-allies-are-clear-a nd-present-danger-american -democracy?utm_source=dail y_newsletter&utm_medium=Em ail&utm_campaign=daily_new sletter_op
rudkla - 22. Jun, 05:09
The Republican Party...
https://truthout.org/artic les/the-republican-party-i s-still-doing-donald-trump s-bidding/?eType=EmailBlas tContent&eId=804d4873-50dd -4c1b-82a5-f465ac3742ce
rudkla - 26. Apr, 05:36
January 6 Committee Says...
https://truthout.org/artic les/jan-6-committee-says-t rump-engaged-in-criminal-c onspiracy-to-undo-election /?eType=EmailBlastContent& eId=552e5725-9297-4a7c-a21 4-53c8c51615a3
rudkla - 4. Mär, 05:38
Georgia Republicans Are...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/02/14/georgi a-republicans-are-delibera tely-attacking-voting-righ ts
rudkla - 15. Feb, 05:03
Now Every Day Is January...
https://www.commondreams.o rg/views/2022/02/07/now-ev ery-day-january-6-trump-ta rgets-vote-counters
rudkla - 8. Feb, 05:41

Archiv

Februar 2026
Mo
Di
Mi
Do
Fr
Sa
So
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
 9 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 

Status

Online seit 7568 Tagen
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 22. Jun, 05:09

Credits


Afghanistan
Animal Protection - Tierschutz
AUFBRUCH für Bürgerrechte, Freiheit und Gesundheit
Big Brother - NWO
Brasilien-Brasil
Britain
Canada
Care2 Connect
Chemtrails
Civil Rights - Buergerrechte - Politik
Cuts in Social Welfare - Sozialabbau
Cybermobbing
Datenschutzerklärung
Death Penalty - Todesstrafe
Depleted Uranium Poisoning (D.U.)
Disclaimer - Haftungsausschluss
... weitere
Profil
Abmelden
Weblog abonnieren