World-News

In his first major foreign policy speech as president, Nicolas Sarkozy of France said Monday that Iran could be attacked militarily if it did not live up to its international obligations to curb its nuclear program.

http://tinyurl.com/yp8zag



Iran's nuclear activities are all lawful

British professor stressed that Iran's nuclear program is perfectly lawful and in accordance with international rules and measures.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=21639&sectionid=351020104



Iran: Consequences of a War

This briefing paper, written by our Global Security Consultant, Professor Paul Rogers, provides a comprehensive analysis of the likely nature of US or Israeli military action that would be intended to disable Iran's nuclear capabilities. It outlines both the immediate consequences in terms of loss of human life, facilities and infrastructure, and also the likely Iranian responses, which would be extensive.

http://tinyurl.com/yv5mjx



Chronology of Iran's Nuclear Programme

1957 The United States and Iran sign a civil nuclear co-operation agreement as part of the US Atoms for Peace program. - 1961 The US Joint Chiefs of Staff suggested to place nuclear weapons in Iran as part of its close links with Iran.

http://tinyurl.com/yqoq5s



Rafsanjani urges Iran to beware of the US

"They (the United States) made a big issue of the nuclear issue and they are mobilising public opinion, their Greater Middle East plan is still on the table," Rafsanjani told the opening session of Iran's Assembly of Experts.

http://tinyurl.com/29x3s4


From Information Clearing House



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Sarkozy
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Rafsanjani
http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/

By Jean Bricmont

Many people in the antiwar movement try to reassure themselves: Bush cannot possibly attack Iran. He does not have the means to do so, or, perhaps, even he is not foolish enough to engage in such an enterprise.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18312.htm



Middle East Madness
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18309.htm



http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Stephen+Lendman

By Nader Bagherzadeh and Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich

The mainstream media in reporting this intricate 'chess game' has decided to champion the side of war and has given the truth a 'check mate'. Even 'reputable' papers such as The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and Washington Post have all decided that serving a departing administration that has led the nation into one quagmire is of greater importance than loyalty to a nation consistent in its devotion to the flag.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18314.htm



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=mainstream+media
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=quagmire
http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Bagherzadeh
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Sepahpour

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/040907_cheney_orders.htm

Fox News Responds To Cheney Call For Iran Attack PR Blitz
http://infowars.net/articles/september2007/050907Iran_war.htm



http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Cheney

AntiWar.Com
by Alan Bock

09/04/07

For months — perhaps even a couple of years — I have been downplaying the likelihood that Bush would be so foolish as to start a war with Iran, especially in light of how much more difficult such a war would be than the war on Iraq and how thinly the military is stretched. It’s not that I don’t think the neocons want such a war or that Bush isn’t just irresponsible enough to do it. I have figured that the military would point out the logistical problems and simply let him know in no uncertain terms that it can’t be done. And I still think that’s a possibility, perhaps even likelihood. Over the last few weeks, however, I have to admit I’ve become a bit less certain...

http://www.antiwar.com/bock/?articleid=11549


Informant: Thomas L. Knapp



http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=neocons
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Alan+Bock

The Democrats have to stand up this week, loud, clear, and demonstrative, and declare that they will not get hustled into supporting a mindless, counterproductive attack on Iran.

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/sep/02/iraq_with_an_n_anatomy_of_a_rumor_that_has_to_be_taken_seriously


From Information Clearing House



http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/

By Simon Floth

On July 11 this year congress loaded and pointed a gun at Iran in the form of Lieberman's amendment to the Defense Authorization act (S.AMDT.2073, amending H.R.1585 and S.AMDT.2011). That was more than six weeks ago, yet the most pivotal feature of the amendment, and indeed of history in the making, has gone entirely unremarked: It is a demonstrable non-sequitur.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18301.htm



http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Lieberman
http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Simon+Floth

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/03/3587/



http://freepage.twoday.net/topics/Is+Iran+next/
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=quagmire
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Chris+Hedges

Sunday, September 2, 2007

http://www.rense.com/general78/we.htm

And then the New China / Russia Coalition are going to nuke the USA !
Because there are thousands of Russian technicians in Iran operating
the Billions of dollars of Russian military equipment for Iran and China
gets much of it's oil from Iran !

ranger116