Mobile mast illness 'just in the mind'?
rudkla - 26. Jul, 23:14
Mobile Radio (worldwide) - Mobilfunk (weltweit) Buergerwelle
Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2007
The residents who saw red over Orange
TOGETHER in protest: West Didsbury residents are furious after Orange erected a phone mast in the village
NEIGHBOURS who created their own picturesque retreat in the heart of West Didsbury were horrified to discover it has been ripped up to make way for a phone mast.
Furious residents have hit out at mobile phone giant Orange after it dug up a Lime Tree and removed a bench next to the grounds of Withington Community Hospital.
Read More...
http://www.southmanchesterreporter.co.uk/news/s/230/230677_the_residents_who_saw_red_over_orange.html
NEIGHBOURS who created their own picturesque retreat in the heart of West Didsbury were horrified to discover it has been ripped up to make way for a phone mast.
Furious residents have hit out at mobile phone giant Orange after it dug up a Lime Tree and removed a bench next to the grounds of Withington Community Hospital.
Read More...
http://www.southmanchesterreporter.co.uk/news/s/230/230677_the_residents_who_saw_red_over_orange.html
rudkla - 26. Jul, 17:34
Cell Towers Not Responsible For Illness?
rudkla - 26. Jul, 17:32
Ordre des Médecins, Conseil National: Colloque Ethique de l'information médicale
- (Ethique et communication : Interventions pages 55 et 56)
http://www.next-up.org/Newsoftheworld/DoctorsAndEmfMedecinsEtCem.php#9
http://www.next-up.org/Newsoftheworld/DoctorsAndEmfMedecinsEtCem.php#9
rudkla - 26. Jul, 17:24
Three-year study shows phone masts safe?
rudkla - 26. Jul, 12:14
Health symptoms not linked to mast emissions?
rudkla - 26. Jul, 12:13
Wi-fi radiation: Is it a danger?
rudkla - 26. Jul, 10:22
Cell phone sensitives don't exist?
rudkla - 26. Jul, 10:06
Are Cell Towers Safe?
Phone mast allergy 'in the mind'?
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4104276/
EMF exposure causing problems
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4104199/
Australia considers increasing its ELF exposure limits and to include new "precautionary measures"
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/4103377/
Child use of antidepressants up four-fold
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4100344/
Ritalin stunts growth of children; long-term risk to children's health unknown
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4100353/
How Exposure to Mobile Phone Base-station Signals can Adversely Affect Humans
http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/Dr%20Hyland%20Evidence.pdf
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4104276/
EMF exposure causing problems
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4104199/
Australia considers increasing its ELF exposure limits and to include new "precautionary measures"
http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/4103377/
Child use of antidepressants up four-fold
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4100344/
Ritalin stunts growth of children; long-term risk to children's health unknown
http://omega.twoday.net/stories/4100353/
How Exposure to Mobile Phone Base-station Signals can Adversely Affect Humans
http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/Dr%20Hyland%20Evidence.pdf
rudkla - 26. Jul, 10:03
Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007
Rejected phone mast plan to go ahead after council error
Jul 25 2007
Nev Wilson
AN OUTRAGED army of residents in Woodhatch is fast gaining numbers after a borough council blunder cast an unwanted shadow over their homes.
More than 100 householders living along Prices Lane and the surrounding streets have signed a petition to prevent the building of a phone mast at the end of their road - a battle they thought was long since won.
Read More...
http://tinyurl.com/36jxeg
--------
Incidentally, how many T-Mobile 56-day rule masts have gone up in the
last 9 months?
I have lost count.
The current T-Mobile approach appears to be as follows:-
1. Put in application
2. Pass brown envelope to Council Planning Officer
3. Wait for Planning Committee to reject mast
4. Wait for Officer in step 2 to send rejection letter after 56 days
5. Erect mast soon after
Brilliant! Saves all that delay and cost involved with an appeal.
M.
From Mast Sanity/Mast Network
Nev Wilson
AN OUTRAGED army of residents in Woodhatch is fast gaining numbers after a borough council blunder cast an unwanted shadow over their homes.
More than 100 householders living along Prices Lane and the surrounding streets have signed a petition to prevent the building of a phone mast at the end of their road - a battle they thought was long since won.
Read More...
http://tinyurl.com/36jxeg
--------
Incidentally, how many T-Mobile 56-day rule masts have gone up in the
last 9 months?
I have lost count.
The current T-Mobile approach appears to be as follows:-
1. Put in application
2. Pass brown envelope to Council Planning Officer
3. Wait for Planning Committee to reject mast
4. Wait for Officer in step 2 to send rejection letter after 56 days
5. Erect mast soon after
Brilliant! Saves all that delay and cost involved with an appeal.
M.
From Mast Sanity/Mast Network
rudkla - 25. Jul, 22:05
