International protest against Bushey Heath phone mast
Watford Observer - Watford, England, UK
He said: “There is no doubt in my mind that over extensive use of mobile phone gives a headache. "I understand that they have to have masts but having two ...
http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/4049313.International_protest_against_Bushey_Heath_phone_mast/
--------
Dear Filip
Thank you for reporting again on the Bushey Heath Phone Mast protest and thank you for referring to WEEP and particularly, the scientific evidence that links mobile phone radiation to adverse health effects.
There is one thing in your article that I wanted to correct. You referred to W.E.E.P.as an - 'anti-mast group'. This is not correct, we have little concern about masts and we are not anti mast. We are extremely concerned about the electro magnetic radiation emitted by antennas (some on masts) and our concern is based on strong scientific evidence ( http://www.bioinitiative.org ) . We are also highly concerned about other forms of electrical and electromagnetic pollution harming people, animals and the environment.
WEEP (The Canadian Initiative against ) - Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution, cares little, if politicians are stupid enough to allow masts that 'blight' highways, towns, cities, the countryside and in particular most scenic high points around the world.
If the antennas on masts did not emit carcinogenic radiation, if they did not affect composition of blood, if they did not affect the heart, the brain and other internal body systems, if they did not harm birds, bees and the environment and if they did not cause what may be the biggest threat to life on earth, WEEP would not complain about all the ugly masts, which have sprouted up over the past twenty years.
WEEP is not opposed to any new technology that is proven to be safe. Microwave radiation (from many sources) is not safe and research over many years has been proven it to be highly dangerous to human health.
Yours sincerely
Martin Weatherall
Co-Director WEEP
http://www.weepinitiative.org
He said: “There is no doubt in my mind that over extensive use of mobile phone gives a headache. "I understand that they have to have masts but having two ...
http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/4049313.International_protest_against_Bushey_Heath_phone_mast/
--------
Dear Filip
Thank you for reporting again on the Bushey Heath Phone Mast protest and thank you for referring to WEEP and particularly, the scientific evidence that links mobile phone radiation to adverse health effects.
There is one thing in your article that I wanted to correct. You referred to W.E.E.P.as an - 'anti-mast group'. This is not correct, we have little concern about masts and we are not anti mast. We are extremely concerned about the electro magnetic radiation emitted by antennas (some on masts) and our concern is based on strong scientific evidence ( http://www.bioinitiative.org ) . We are also highly concerned about other forms of electrical and electromagnetic pollution harming people, animals and the environment.
WEEP (The Canadian Initiative against ) - Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution, cares little, if politicians are stupid enough to allow masts that 'blight' highways, towns, cities, the countryside and in particular most scenic high points around the world.
If the antennas on masts did not emit carcinogenic radiation, if they did not affect composition of blood, if they did not affect the heart, the brain and other internal body systems, if they did not harm birds, bees and the environment and if they did not cause what may be the biggest threat to life on earth, WEEP would not complain about all the ugly masts, which have sprouted up over the past twenty years.
WEEP is not opposed to any new technology that is proven to be safe. Microwave radiation (from many sources) is not safe and research over many years has been proven it to be highly dangerous to human health.
Yours sincerely
Martin Weatherall
Co-Director WEEP
http://www.weepinitiative.org
rudkla - 15. Jan, 12:36
